The famous TV presenter Boris Notkin died: the body of a 75-year-old journalist was found in his house in the Odintsovo district of the Moscow region. An investigation team is working on the spot, the main version is suicide.
According to preliminary data, Boris Isaevich suffered from cancer. A suicide note was allegedly found on the spot, where, in particular, he said: “I am leaving this life voluntarily,” as I was “tired of suffering.”
Popular actors, politicians, athletes, statesmen came to visit the journalist in his author's program “Boris Notkin Invites” on the TV Center channel for an interview. The last episode aired on March 9, 2015 - age and health did not allow working as before, but until the last days, Notkin remained an adviser to the general director of the TV Center channel Yulia Bystritskaya.
The tragic news took the staff and stars of the channel by surprise.
What a horror ... - only the host of the program "Wife" Kira Proshutinskaya could say. Later, an obituary appeared - even from the dry official lines it is clear that he was very much appreciated on the channel: “Boris Isaevich worked on the channel for 20 years - from the very foundation of the TV Center.” His programs enjoyed constant success with viewers. An unsurpassed interviewer, he easily found a common language with all the guests. He was loved and respected by all his colleagues without exception.”
Boris Notkin was born on August 13, 1942 in Moscow, a translator by education, worked at Moscow State University at the intersection of sociology and psycholinguistics. Once he was a simultaneous interpreter for director Sergei Bondarchuk, when he worked with the composer of the film “Waterloo” Nino Rota, translated for Franco Zeffirelli ... On television since 1986: hosted the program “Good evening, Moscow”, “Facing the city”, etc. on MTK (Moscow television channel).
Notkin was known as a merry fellow and an optimist. He loved an active lifestyle: cycling, tennis. In the latter, he played in tandem with Nikolai Karachentsov - once they had a chance to fight Boris Yeltsin and Shamil Tarpishchev.
He married, as he himself said, "obscenely late" - at the age of 48. But out of love, for the sake of which he tied up with amorous exploits, but on occasion he recalled: “before marrying Irina Ivanovna, I was a professional womanizer.” In an interview with Express Gazeta, Notkin said that his wife was a specialist in energy economics, but for the sake of her husband she left the service and became his personal assistant and stylist. In the same country house, bought with money from the sale of two apartments, they lived happily for 21 years. They didn't have children.
Dmitry Dibrov - about Boris Notkin: "He was a professor"
Dmitry Dibrov worked for a long time with Boris Notkin on the same field. Today he remembers a departed colleague:
“In recent years, the “scoop” Boris Isaevich was, as they say, “in place”. It was a time when the "120-ruble intelligentsia" felt itself to be a real force. But when the new television began, of course, he could not cope with it. Because he is a "professor" - his manner of presenting the program did not fall into the stylistic flamboyance that always accompanies revolutions. And in the 1990s there was a television revolution: the “iron worker sailors” went to the fore, and the “professorship” looked out of time: a quiet voice, an academic demeanor in the frame.
In recent years, we have not seen Boris Isaevich on the screen, because the rating is an inexorable thing. In the same way that Yury Mikhailovich Luzhkov’s rating “left” politics, so he “left” the air and his favorite television partner, Boris Isaevich Notkin. New people have arrived. Good memory, colleague. The inexorable movement of the wheel of time ... "
Invites Boris Notkin - Mikhail Zadornov. Mikhail Zadornov visiting Boris Notkin
INTERVIEW
Boris Notkin: A wife is very important! I declare as a former womanizer!
His program “Boris Notkin Invites” (TV Center channel) has been aired on Sundays on TV Center for 24 years. On the eve of the birthday, we talked with the hero of the day
Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.
Hosted at http://www.allbest.ru/
Analysisprograms" PBoris Notkin announces" And" man in the rain"
1. Interview
1.1 Interview - general information
Interview (from English, interview - literally a meeting, a conversation) is a genre of journalism, which is a conversation between a journalist and a socially significant person on topical issues.
The television interview went even further, enriching the genre with an essential quality - spectacle. Due to the audiovisual nature of television communication, the source of information is not only sounding speech with all the richness of its rhetoric, intonation, emotional coloring (as on the radio), but also facial expressions, gestures, behavior of the interlocutors, and often their environment (interior of the room, landscape surrounding people, etc.). It is the spectacle that explains the special authenticity and, as a result, the wide distribution of the genre of interviews in television programs.
As many experienced interviewers rightly warn, in order to get to the deepest properties of the interlocutor's personality, a special mental attitude is required from the interviewer. Otherwise, everything will seem to be right, maybe even at ease, but it will not excite, will not affect, will not evoke reciprocal feelings.
A common mistake new interviewers make is the belief that asking is easier than answering. No, the interview is a co-creation. Its success largely depends on the leader. In his questions to the interlocutor, the journalist, as it were, anticipates what the readers themselves, radio listeners, and TV viewers would like to ask. And for this, the interviewer must prepare for the conversation: outline a preliminary list of questions based on familiarity with the dossier (if any, if the interlocutor is sufficiently famous, on the Internet or in the reference service of the television company), with the interlocutor's previous statements; it can be useful to ask about him, his habits and cases from the life of various knowledgeable people - colleagues, family members.
The interview as a genre occupies a special place on the television screen. In fact, there is not a single news release where journalists would not ask questions to competent people, would not address participants in various events, or would be interested in the opinion of others about certain important events. The interview is an indispensable element of many complex television forms. Less commonly, it is used to create a self-transmission.
Depending on the task set by the journalist, there is an opinion interview (a statement on any occasion) and an interview fact (a message about something known to a given person).
The interview genre is used only when the interviewee can say more than a journalist, or when the interviewee supports a certain public campaign with his speech, if this issue is in the center of attention of many people and it is required to find out their views. Interviewees are traditionally divided into three categories:
The objectives of the interviews of the first and second categories overlap to some extent, many prominent personalities are experts in their field. For example, a well-known political figure, speaking as an official on some aspects of the politics of his party, may clearly reveal himself as a person during the interview.
Ideally, an on-screen interview (with the exception of a formal situation) should look like a casual conversation between two people, one of whom is more informed on the topic under discussion. But these people could just talk not in the studio pavilion, without cameras and lighting equipment. Therefore, there is a certain duality in the very nature of television dialogue.
Interview-portrait - a special kind of television interview with the aim of fully revealing the personality of the interlocutor. Socio-psychological emotional characteristics, the identification of the interviewee's value system, are of primary importance. Often acts as an integral part of the screen essay.
The informational interview is the most common form of on-screen dialogue. In any case, in news releases, the vast majority of meetings between journalists and their interlocutors take place in order to obtain specific information from a person who owns the necessary information. Most often, such interviews perform two interrelated tasks: obtaining socially significant information plus identifying some personality traits of the carrier of this information.
In a good informational interview, each question is individualized, designed specifically for the person with whom the journalist is talking in this particular case. Sometimes sounding on the screen naive sentences like "please tell us something about ..." is evidence of the journalist's unpreparedness for an interview.
An informational interview for its leading journalist does not at all mean obtaining absolutely new information for him. The professional usually basically knows what he will hear in response, and clearly, thoughtfully conducts a conversation. This, as we have already emphasized, does not mean at all that the interlocutors discussed all the questions that will be asked before shooting. On-screen questions are never, under any circumstances, when preparing an informational interview, are communicated to the interviewee, at least in the wording in which they will sound in the frame. Otherwise, the element of improvisation will be lost, the phenomenon of the word being born before the eyes of viewers, without which the television interview will lose the flavor of novelty, immediacy, naturalness, so necessary for a full-fledged spectator's perception.
1.2 About TV interviews
“A journalist receives the necessary information by being present at important events, getting acquainted with documents and other sources, but, above all, by communicating with people who are information carriers. Any process of human communication, as a rule, proceeds in the form of a dialogue - questions and answers.
The genres of television journalism, in which the main visual and expressive means is the word, live human speech, and the form of existence is dialogue (communication), are of particular importance for television, since the communicative process, expressed mainly by speech with the addition of facial expressions and pantomimes, is one of the foundations of television as a social system, directly corresponding to the nature of the screen.
An interview (from the English interview - literally a meeting, a conversation) is a genre of journalism, which is a conversation between a journalist and a socially significant person on topical issues.
The interview is very popular as a genre and method of collecting information.
When you read interviews printed in a newspaper or magazine, you certainly get some idea of the personality of the person being interviewed. But, firstly, this representation may be inaccurate, since what this person said, you will learn not directly from him, but through the interviewer who put his words on paper. Secondly, even this idea refers more to the intellectual component of a person's personality; his physical identity is hidden from the reader. In radio transmission, the situation is almost the same. “Almost”, and not “exactly the same”, because the voice is still part of the physical essence of a person. Directly, sensually perceiving, listening to a live voice, you get some information about the physical individuality of a person: after all, this or that timbre of voice, richness or poverty of intonations, manner of speaking - all this in itself informs the listener of additional information about the speaker. Sometimes, regardless of the content of speech, regardless of what a person says, by the way he speaks, one can understand not only that he is young or old, but also to find out whether this person is intelligent, cheerful or boring, good-natured or gloomy. One can judge his attitude towards people, the degree of his openness, sincerity, i.e. about spiritual traits.
When before your eyes the face of this person with all shades of emotions, the impression that he and his story makes on you is greatly enhanced. A psychological mechanism begins to work, called by scientists the “filter of trust and distrust”. If the appearance of a person overcomes this filter that exists in our minds, the impact of speech intensifies many times over, the effect of suggestion begins to affect, sometimes acting stronger than logical arguments.
The main, decisive difference between radio broadcasting and television is that radio affects only a person’s hearing, while television is also addressed to his vision.
An interview on television is a genre of journalism, which is a conversation between a journalist and a political, public or other figure on topical issues in front of the camera. 2-3 persons can take part in the interview. Of course, television interviews have an undeniable advantage - visual possibilities. “Television interviews are extremely concise (action, movement, speech are the spring of dialogue). The main thing that is required from a journalist in an interview is the ability to think publicly. Questions are not asked in protocol, but in a lively dialogue.
2. Program reviews
2.1 About the program "Boris Notkin Invites"
The genre of the program "Boris Notkin Invites" is an interview. Popular actors, politicians, athletes, statesmen come to visit the famous host.
The host often asks his guests how they achieved success, overcame difficulties and obstacles, which helped them find their own way. Much attention is paid to the hero's personal life in the program: childhood impressions, relationships with the opposite sex, taste preferences and even a sense of humor. In this colorful mosaic, if you wish, you can see role models in everyday life and profession, way of thinking and behavior.
Extensive journalistic experience and invariably friendly attitude towards guests allow the presenter to touch on almost any topic in conversations.
2.2 mastersTin Boris Notkin as an interviewer
“When a conversation takes place in a pleasant and cozy atmosphere, it literally disposes the interlocutors to various kinds of revelations regarding personal life and individual preferences. The program “Boris Notkin Invites” creates just such an atmosphere in which each guest of the studio feels peace and comfort, in which this fascinating conversation will take place.
This program is one of the varieties of interviews, during which a fruitful dialogue is established between the presenter and the guest, which pleasantly pleases a large audience of viewers.
The guests tell us exactly what factors contributed to such a rapid progress up the ladder of success. The issue of personal life, aesthetic, taste and other preferences of each new guest is not left without attention. Viewers who choose this particular program for themselves, which resembles a colorful mosaic of interesting facts, can find an example to follow that will help them make the main choice regarding everyday life, profession and way of thinking. All these people have achieved some success and are fully prepared to help every modern TV viewer who is going through a difficult period of doubt find their way. (Oleg Kondratyuk)"
I agree with the author of this publication, but there are few external factors for an interesting and in-depth interview. Therefore, it is important that a journalist does not reach for a sensation or a high rating, but strives for the greatest objectivity in presenting the facts. And this program is no exception. If we analyze this transmission, we can see that both factors are present in it. We will try to examine it from the inside: to analyze and identify what methods of representation Boris Notkin uses.
The method we will be using is the observation method. Observation is the first stage in the crystallization of a visual image and allows you to highlight the features of the paint layer, designate the form and background, as well as extrapolate and identify the characters. In our case, the method of observation allows us to highlight the features of the values that Boris Isaevich relies on in his program.
One of the tricks that Boris Notkin uses in his program is a comparison: “<…>And then for 3 months it was possible to do nothing ...
In order not to be a parasite ...
Here I was lying on the couch, lying. My dad already said to me: “You are already doing something. Why lie around like this all summer? So the musicians from the restaurant came to me: “Kol, maybe you will sing with us while you are not doing anything?” I agreed, and one day I went on stage and began to sing<…>". Here you can see how Notkin compares Nikolai Noskov with a parasite in order to provoke his response and thereby provoke him to continue the conversation. Namely, thanks to this technique, we see how the hero of the program represents the value of "labor" and, in general, his attitude to work and work.
Boris Isaevich in all interviews asks about the guest's parents. In this issue, one way or another, the theme of labor is touched. Since the heroes of the program talk not only about the relationship with their parents, but also about their life, including work:
“- Mark, tell us about your parents.
They are wonderful people; people who work hard. And it's been that way for as long as I can remember. My parents were at work from morning to evening. But at the same time, my brother and I were not ownerless either. My mother is a doctor and still works at City Hospital 71 in Moscow.”
Sometimes Notkin uses associations. For example, in the same interview with Mark Tishman, Boris Isaevich asks Mark about the schedule of his mother's day, but it is clear that with this question he wants to show his respect for hardworking people:
Is it true that every morning she gets up at 6 am, leaves at 7, and returns at 10 pm?
The absolute truth, and therefore, it often hurts me to watch on the news, on TV, when such big companies rise up, and our doctors are so and so, and behind them there is an eye, yes an eye. I understand that doctors are different. But using the example of my mother, I have been to her hospital more than once. I see that they are just holy people, especially compared to the people I meet in show business. These are holy people who work hard."
Notkin Boris also includes in the program such a technique as the use of direct text:
“- How did Vika manage to re-educate you like that? Because after the army you did not work anywhere for half a year, and now you are such a workaholic.
Yes, I have always been a workaholic!
Six months without doing anything for girlfriends.
Ts, I tried to do something ... I went to all the auditions, I wanted to work, I really wanted to work. And as I was taught. I have a record - I did not leave the theater institute for 15 days. I became a workaholic at the Shchukin Theater Institute. Because during the day we studied, and at night we rehearsed before independent excerpts ”(Interview with Anton Makarsky)
This approach is the most common. Since you do not need to use any tricks in order to get a complete answer to the question asked.
Thanks to the variety of techniques that Notkin uses, the questions are always varied and correct. That allows the viewer to fully appreciate the personality of the hero from various angles.
2.3 About "Man in the Rain"
This program also relies on the interview method. But the purpose of this program is completely different. If Boris Notkin in his program devotes most of his time to the personality of the guest, then in the program "Man in the Rain" the main goal is to discuss some important problem for society.
The personality of the guest is very important to the viewer, because the audience wants to know the opinion of a competent person. But here no special attention is paid to the family and personal characteristics of the interviewee.
If in the program “Boris Notkin Invites” the host has an important role, he can not only ask questions, but also comment, joke, then in the program “Man in the Rain” the role of the host is relegated to the background. But, despite this, the program always turns out to be informative and dynamic.
2.4 Comparative analysis of programs"Boris Notkin invites"and "The Man Underrain"
Everyone knows that the success of a program or interview depends on the presenter. In his questions to the interlocutor, the journalist, as it were, anticipates what the readers themselves, radio listeners, and TV viewers would like to ask.
In the program “Boris Notkin Invites”, the presenter himself makes direct references to the desire of the audience to hear the answer to any answer they are interested in.
Boris Notkin: But seriously, the viewer is interested in: what do you value in a woman? Do you believe in friendship between a man and a woman?
In the program “Man in the Rain”, the presenters do not make reference to the audience, the journalist himself is a spectator of what is happening, so the questions he asks are relevant to everyone. Sometimes it concerns the personality of the hero of the program, but we face this every day, and our attention is focused on such issues.
Mongait: How do you limit yourself in food? Here you are personally, and in principle, what is, in your opinion, the taboo that cannot be violated for sure?
Chenot: I am already 70 years old, and I must take into account the peculiarities of the work of the heart, lungs, intestines at the age of 70. The best thing for me: for breakfast - a lot of green tea with fruits, and I have breakfast very early. At lunch - first, be sure to have a large portion of salad, because at least six hours have passed since breakfast. Hunger is a nervous phenomenon. Chewing the salad, you begin to calm down a little. Then - necessarily carbohydrates: rice or pasta. In the evening I eat vegetable soup - I generally really like vegetable soups - and something protein: fish, chicken, sometimes even meat. This is normal food for me. But in a month I definitely arrange myself three days of detox.
Mongait: I would like to ask you a few questions in a blitz mode, that is, short questions related to stamps in the mass consciousness. Here we consider, for example, that coffee is harmful. Is it really harmful?
Interviewees are traditionally divided into three categories:
1) politicians and statesmen, specialists and other people with specific knowledge in a particular area; they are interviewed to find out about something;
2) celebrities who are interviewed so that the details of their lives and activities become available to the general public;
3) ordinary people with whom we meet at home, on the street, in the service; they are interviewed to find out the public opinion about a particular event.
In both programs, only the first two categories are present.
Programs differ in their goals. And depending on this, the hosts have to select guests.
3. Moral values in the programs on the TV channel "Rain" and "TV Center"
And now let's look at the definition of "moral values" and how they are located in the programs on the TV channel "Rain" and "TV Center".
Moral values are the rules of behavior in a social environment that are optimal for maintaining stability in it and giving everyone equal opportunities for individual development. In other words, these are the main laws of the hostel. Their violation leads to the disintegration of society or degeneration. Moral values are based on a person's feeling, not on reason.
The space of moral relations is exceptionally vast; it embraces all spheres of a person's inner world and all areas of his external social relations. Always and everywhere a person can or should strive to behave morally, although we are far from always absolutely sure of the beneficialness of our moral act or that we acted in the best way, since we often make a choice between different moral values, inevitably bringing some of them as a sacrifice to others. The catalog of moral values is made up of those realities and actions that we not only evaluate, but approve, i.e. we evaluate them as kind, good, good, etc. It includes the qualities of humanity, which constitute the position of the individual, the natural basis of her morality, as well as moral principles and norms of behavior, which are also determined by the qualities of a person. P. Kurtz in the work “Forbidden Fruit. The Ethics of Humanism offers the following catalog of general moral standards: honesty, truthfulness, commitment, sincerity, fidelity, devotion, reliability, benevolence, benevolence, non-injury to others, non-damage to private or public property, consent to sexual relations, beneficence, decency, gratitude , responsibility, justice, tolerance, cooperation.
3.1 Moral values in the program "Boris Notkin Invites"
In the program "Boris Notkin Invites" one can distinguish such human needs as family, love, relationships with women, work, success, human relationships. On their basis, it is possible to determine the moral values on which the leader relies when creating the program.
Therefore, we will consider human needs in the program of Boris Notkin; and establish a connection between needs and moral values.
The value of the family in the Boris Notkin Invites program plays an important role. Almost all interviews begin with questions about the family: “Mark, tell us about your parents”, “You were raised in some indecently positive way: don’t smoke, don’t drink, don’t swear - what kind of childhood did you have?”, “You also told that dad was upset by the choice of your specialty, he said: "I would like Yefim to have a profession that is easier in the zone" ... ".
Sometimes in the program it turns out that no matter how the conversation begins, everything still rests on the family. For example, in an interview with Nikolai Noskov, Boris Notkin asked about the singer's acquaintance with his future wife. And the conversation still touched on the topic of the family:
“- But you, apparently, adhere to the old principles, because 30 years ago you met Marina in a restaurant in Cherepovets and are still faithful to her.
I try, I try (laughs). But the fact is that it most likely comes from my family. I have such an Old Believer family, and in our dining room in the red corner back in those Soviet times, when everything was in the law and prohibited, John the Baptist still stood. My grandmother kept very strict fasts - water and porridge. And Easter was our most serious holiday. The children's birthday was practically not celebrated, only when I was 14 years old, probably, my father allowed me to celebrate birthdays. But it is necessary to celebrate the birthday of God, and when a person celebrates his birthday, and even so chic, i.e. someone should celebrate your birthday, not you yourself. That's right then." (Interview with Nikolai Noskov)
“- There is a statement that every man is looking, subconsciously, in his wife for similarity with his mother. What was your mother like?
Mom was a unique person: she was beautiful, she was smart, she was very open and very kind. She helped people. In her psychology, she was such a Christian person, as it should be according to the Bible. And if I look for something similar, similar - I, so the search will end in nothing. And I had the same grandmother, uh, in general - the parents of my parents, so ... Yes, my aunt, my mother's sister has a theory that neither I nor my nephew will, uh, get married in the near future. Because we always have before us the ideal of some kind of family relationship that we had.” (Interview with Maxim Galkin).
Equally important are the value of love and relationships with women. Most often, these two concepts overlap. Judging by the questions Boris Notkin asks: - But seriously, the viewer is interested in: what do you value in a woman? “Do you believe in friendship between a man and a woman?”, it can be assumed that the theme of love is one of the main themes.
There are also questions that themselves touch the topic of love and women:
“- And once it is necessary. Then it's fate. And what is it about Marina that has hooked you for life?
She is truly a Russian woman. Character, fidelity, devotion, selfless love. To a loved one, eternal concern for him, and she is very beautiful, just beautiful. (Interview with Nikolai Noskov).
“Now I understand why you refused to give comments about love to one publication. You said: "No Kama Sutra will teach love."
Now I understand that my opinion will not change anything. Because in such complex and subtle issues, and always very personal, like love and attraction, I will not discover anything new in this case.
Also, the program is not complete without questions about work and work, because the guests who come to the program are people who have achieved success in any field of activity, be it music, politics, cinema, theater, etc.
Labor is usually understood as "the expedient human activity aimed at creating material and spiritual benefits."
Boris Isaevich always learns about how the hero of the program achieved success, whether there are any secrets of success. Let's look at this value in more detail.
Not in every episode of the program, the host asks questions about success. But guests often mention it themselves:
“Well, definitely improved. And, before I was a famous person, I was quite boring and self-doubting. And when, well, when some kind of success came, I began to doubt myself less, it helped me in life. When I enter some hypermarket, and there is a security guard, it was just recently, the day before yesterday, the security guard is standing, and the woman who cleans there, there is also a seller - oh, how glad we are to see you, we are so pleased, of course, this brings some light and joy to life, and, uh, I honestly can’t imagine life without it already. ” (Interview with Maxim Galkin).
“They are not invited to Dagestan, yes. Unfortunately I can't say anything here. No, I love Dagestan, I love Moscow very much, I love it. Of course, now this is my city to a greater extent, because my conscious life is in Moscow, my first love is connected with it there, there are such favorite places, my some successes are connected with this. I had 5 years at GITIS, I believe that during these years I began to become a person: performances, first tours. This is also Moscow, so Moscow is already my hometown.” (Interview with Mark Tishman).
Sometimes Notkin asks questions that are completely unrelated to any value, such as the value of "success", but such questions help the hero reveal the "secret of his success" to the audience:
«- I know that you have read many books on psychology and are trying to remake yourself.
Desktop psychology was very interesting to me. And now it is interesting to me, but unfortunately I can no longer pay so much attention to it. I had to change a lot in myself, in the course of my sports career. I'm quite explosive, quite quick-tempered. Now it's less, much less. And I always defended my position, moreover, by any means. It seemed to me that one must always fight for the truth right now ... not paying attention to anything! Now, of course, I am sure that one must fight for the truth, but there are different ways, and you can approach the same problem in different ways. Yes, the truth can be approached in different ways. One should try to think ahead about success. Those. do not think about where the cons will be, but try to create an atmosphere in the head of success, i.e. this must end well! Even if there are some small deviations, this does not mean that it is a failure. It is impossible to achieve success without seeing some disappointments along the way. And so this feeling of success is very important to develop in yourself. Success in life, success in tomorrow, success in what you do. And it seems to me that it gives strength and it takes you to the path that leads you to this very success.”
And another aspect that is touched upon in the program is human relations: friends, colleagues, relatives, etc.: “- They say that you are especially good in the company, unlike many other clowns, humorists, jesters who - gloomy, you are a very cheerful and joyful person in life”, “Personally, this is not at all interesting to me, but the audience will not understand me if I don’t ask a question, if I don’t ask about your friendship with Alla Borisovna”, “- That there is a "Two Stars" you won exclusively for Nona Grishaeva, who is very upset when she does not receive the highest scores, etc.
Boris Notkin always expresses his opinion and attitude towards something. The interview is built in a friendly format. And therefore, if opinions do not coincide, then Notkin will not miss the chance to talk about it: “You and I have completely different personal experiences, you say that you don’t believe in friendship between a man and a woman, but on the contrary, my best friends are women” , “Valentin Yudashkin has a good nose for talent. He invited you to write a song for his fashion show by March 8”, “I think this is especially important to you, because all the newspapers call you: the most enviable groom in Russia. Would you marry a witch” - this makes the program interesting and lively.
The program is built in the form of a dialogue between the presenter and the guest. During the conversation, the personality of the interviewee, his family, career, position in society and social problems are discussed. Previously, Boris Isaevich invited only ministers, oligarchs, generals to the studio. He liked to talk about macroeconomics, geopolitics... Now the guests are mostly actors, composers, athletes, musicians.
Boris Notkin says about this: “I stopped giving my own assessments, because at some point I caught myself thinking: I am annoyed by amateurs who impose their opinions where it is better to listen to the opinion of a specialist. Yes, and the respectable public has lost interest in the chiefs, and the officials themselves recall the times of glasnost with disgust and do not rush to the screen.
3.2 Moral values in the program "Man in the Rain"
"Boris Notkin invites" and "Man in the rain"? programs that are based on interviews. But despite this, they are completely different. The goals, objectives, as well as moral values on which the programs are built are different.
We have already considered the values that Boris Notkin relies on in his program, now we need to consider them in the Man in the Rain program. This will allow us to find out not only the goals of the program and the presenter, but also to compare even the policies of the TV Center and Dozhd channels.
The host in "Man in the Rain" plays the role of a journalist, not an interlocutor. Leaders almost never give their opinion. The only thing they allow themselves to do is ask tricky questions, which the interviewees do not always answer with desire or do not answer at all.
Zhelnov: Regarding Mikhail Chernov, about the settlement agreement, the Vedomosti newspaper wrote in its column that thanks to this settlement agreement, we will never know the alternative biography of Oleg Deripaska and your true path to empire, to wealth.
Deripaska: You know, the Vedomosti newspaper is generally a shallow newspaper, I strongly advise the Dozhd channel not to follow this path. We have already said that we will not comment on this.
Zhelnov: Are you satisfied with the result of the amicable agreement?
Deripaska: We agreed that we would not comment.
The host of the program is not one person. In each program, you can see something new, because the interviews are not held in the studio, but in completely different places, this is a gym, a cafe, etc. The main purpose of the transmission is relevance and topicality. The hosts invite guests who can comment on any political, economic situation in Russia and the world, as well as professionals in various fields.
Despite this, we will try to identify the moral values that are contained in the program.
Several times the presenters invited nutritionists to the program. They were asked a variety of questions, but almost the entire program was built on such a human need as health.
Mongait: I know that people who today in modern culture are called celebrities go to your clinics, for example, there is the former President of Georgia Saakashvili, the famous Russian oligarch Elena Baturina, Silvio Berlusconi himself. Why are they coming to you?
Chenot: We are engaged in prevention and even health forecasting. Prevention involves avoiding possible problems. Nutrigenetics and research at the DNA level play a significant role in forecasting. In some cases, it is possible to foresee what might happen after, say, 7 years, and we are trying to influence this, to give advice for the future. Within 8 days we study a person, we study his reactions. Our laboratory finds out how capable of recovery he is, how his problems can be solved, and then we give a number of recommendations: what to do after leaving the clinic. We have an individual approach, we study the genetic properties and the ability to regenerate.
Mongait: I have read in several of your interviews that you criticize some of the popular diets. Right now, one of the most popular diets in Russia is the Dukan diet. You call it almost a stimulus for the development of cancer. Why?
Also, very often without delving into the personality of the hero, the hosts still touch on such a value as a family.
Mirzaev: And what should I tell them, if so judge? They cannot return their son, and as a father, I know these feelings. He won't come back, I don't know what to tell them.
Belogolovtsev: Now I, as the father of a little daughter, will ask you - how was it explained to her what happened to you? What does she know now?
Mirzaev: She is now 3.5 years old. She saw on TV when they took her to me, she said: “Let go, bad uncles, my dad!”. The first time I went out, she hugged me tightly, looked into my eyes and cried. The child is 3.5 years old, he doesn’t seem to understand anything, but she looks at me, hugs me and says: “Dad, dad”, and does not let me go.
A very frequent question is about the attitude towards Russian politicians and their activities. For example, in the issue dated February 01, 2013.
Zhelnov: You again ran into Dmitry Medvedev here. He told Bloomberg that Sergei Magnitsky was a mere accountant and was merely defending his executives who were involved in illegal commercial transactions in Russia. Were you surprised by Medvedev's reaction?
Browder: No, the reaction did not surprise me, since this was the position of Putin and Medvedev from the very beginning. They want to cover up the facts, namely that Sergei Magnitsky exposed the embezzlement of $230 million from the state by corrupt officials. He presented this fact to the Investigative Committee, as a result of which he was arrested, tortured first for three, and then for 58 days, and killed. This murder is undeniable and everyone in Russia knows about it.
Zhelnov: In 2007, here you asked Medvedev to help you with a visa, and he responded, saying that he would consider the documents. Why has Medvedev's position changed so much over the past 6 years?
Browder: In 2007, I spoke with Medvedev at a business dinner, he was not ready for my request, and there were enough representatives of the press. I asked him a personal question: my visa was suspended, could you help to restore it. He looked around the room, all the people who were witnesses to this conversation, and since at that time he was trying to strengthen his authority in the West, he said: yes, I will help you with a visa. I should note that at that time the criminal case against me had not yet been initiated. It was only opened when we reported the theft of our companies to the police and gave the names of the policemen, and it was these policemen who later filed a criminal case against me.
The questions asked by the presenters allowed the viewer to evaluate not only the work of the guest, but also his personality. And also thanks to this we see what moral values are embedded in these programs.
The core moral value of the Man in the Rain program is honesty.
Interviewees have to answer all questions honestly, but when it comes to discussing topics that are unpleasant to them, they openly declare that they do not want to talk about it. Journalists sometimes try to make sure that the invitee is honest, ask clarifying questions, etc.
Belogolovtsev: The Russian Championship is your first tournament, how did the fans react to you?
Mirzaev: Honestly?
Belogolovtsev: Honestly.
Mirzaev: When I fight, I don't hear what's going on, but I was told that the public was against me. They shouted: "Break it!". When I was losing 9-0 in the second fight, there was a minute left, I didn’t hear, I was all in the fight, and then they told me that the audience stood up and shouted: “Break him!”. When the fight was over, I strangled my opponent, and silence immediately came.
Belogolovtsev: Was there any contact with the fans after the fight, autographs, or vice versa, did you avoid you?
Mirzaev: One man approached me, he was connected with the second fight, I kicked out his student, he later admitted to me that they were preparing him purely for me. Such a healthy man, with a beard all over, he comes up to me and says, shaking my hand: “I would do the same,” and I told him: “Let's not talk about it, please.”
Belogolovtsev: If you evaluate yourself as a percentage of the ideal Rasul Mirzaev, what percentage do you have now?
Mirzaev: 50% and 50 more left.
Justice? it is the second value that dominates the program.
The guests of the program are often ambiguous and extraordinary personalities. The audience has a biased attitude about such people, and sometimes such an interview causes a huge public outcry. For example, oligarchs, whom the audience thinks not as successful, hardworking people, but as cunning, deceitful thieves. But during the interview, the heroes reveal all their cards and reveal the truth to many events in the country:
Zhelnov: You claim that Russia is corrupt, but at the same time in Russia, in addition to buying shares, you were also involved in an investigative audit. Thanks to you, the former leadership of Gazprom, headed by Rem Vyakhirev, resigned. Were you also part of that system then? Without a decision from above, no one could dismiss Vyakhirev. Did you work for someone, in someone's interests?
Browder: In the 1990s, the most important problem in Russia was that 22 oligarchs stole more than 50 percent of the country from the people, while the remaining 145 million people lived in deep poverty. Nurses had to sell themselves, professors had to become taxi drivers. It was a humiliation of Russia, and everyone who has a heart and who saw that this was happening wanted it to stop as soon as possible. When Putin came to power, he declared that he would bring order to the country and take money and power from the oligarchs. And I, like everyone in Russia, thought, thank God, someone will solve this problem. And when Putin came to power, and I was exposing corruption in Gazprom, I fought the same people as him - the oligarchs, including Rem Vyakhirev, and our interests coincided from 2000 to 2004, while he was trying to win his war with the oligarchs . But I did not understand that after the arrest of Khodorkovsky, he won his war with the oligarchs and became the biggest oligarch himself. From that moment on, the situation began to deteriorate.”
And the audience is then divided into two parts: those who found something new and changed their minds, and those who remained at the same point of view.
The choice of these or those moral values depends on the goals set by the presenters of the programs.
Conclusion
An interview is a genre of journalism, which is a conversation between a journalist and a socially significant person on topical issues.
Spectacle explains the special reliability and, as a result, the wide distribution of the genre of interviews in television programs.
"Boris Notkin invites" and "Man in the rain"? programs, the core of which is the interview. But despite this, they are completely different. The goals, objectives, as well as moral values on which the programs are built are different.
In the course of the study, we were able to find out what moral values the leaders rely on when building a program.
In the Boris Notkin Invites program, this is loyalty, devotion, decency, cooperation, beneficence. But for the hosts of the "Man in the Rain" program, other moral values are important: honesty, reliability, goodwill, justice, responsibility.
The choice of certain moral values depends on the tasks set by the presenters of the programs.
The programs differ in their goals. And depending on this, the hosts have to select guests.
Most often these are: politicians and statesmen, specialists and other people with specific knowledge in a particular area; they are interviewed to find out about something or celebrities who are interviewed so that the details of their lives and activities become available to the general public;
In the program “Boris Notkin Invites”, the goal is to introduce us or reveal the identity of the interviewee.
The hosts of "Man in the Rain" set a completely different goal - to show all sides of a problematic situation. The invited guests are competent on a certain issue.
That is why interviews are different. Boris Notkin has an interview-portrait. And "Man in the Rain" is more like an informational or problem interview.
Bibliography
interviewer notkin man rain
1. Television journalism. Textbook / Ed. Col.: G.V. Kuznetsov, V.L. Zvik, A.Ya. Yurovsky. 4th edition. - M.: Moscow State University, Higher School, 2002 // http://evartist.narod.ru/text6/23.htm
2. Golanova E.I. Oral public dialogue: interview genre // Russian language of the end of the XX century. M., 2000
3. Technology interview. MM. Lukin. M.: Aspect Press, 2003. - 191 p.
http://sch1636.ru/_/book/luk/Index.htm
4. Voroshilov V.V. Journalism. SPb., 1999.
5. Tertychny A.A. Genres of periodicals: Textbook / A.A. Tertychny. - 2nd ed., corrected. and additional - M.: Aspect press, 2002. - 320 p.
6. "Boris Notkin has been inviting for 10 years." Newspaper "Culture" 10.03.2009
7. Sahakyan A.K. Sociocultural conditionality of the value of labor. // Vestnik KRSU. 2011. Volume 11, No. 2, p. 156
8. Kim M.N. Technology of creating a journalistic work. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of Mikhailov V.A., 2001.
9. Zvik V.L. Television journalism: History, theory, practice. Moscow: Aspect-Press, 2004.
Hosted on Allbest.ru
The creative path of A. Pimanov. General characteristics of the program "Man and Law". The main trends in the development of analytical programs on television. The journalistic skills of the presenter Alexei Pimanov. Unsuitability of leading analytical programs.
term paper, added 12/17/2009
Specific features of modeling television programs. The use of methods of television influence on the consciousness of the television audience in the creation of cultural programs. Features of the compositional construction of television entertainment show programs.
thesis, added 08/28/2010
Features of information-analytical television programs. defining their artistic originality. The history of the formation and development of the genre on domestic television. Analysis of the topics, behavior and image of the leading programs "Vremena" and "Vesti Nedeli".
term paper, added 06/06/2013
Television news programs as an element of reality transformation. Implementation of European Union policy in the field of audiovisual media. The main audiovisual characteristics of the news programs of the Euronews TV channel.
thesis, added 02/11/2013
Acquaintance with the theoretical foundations of modern news programs. The program on television as a result of the work of many specialists. Characteristics of the TV channel "Impulse - Novy Urengoy", analysis of the features of planning and preparing news information.
term paper, added 05/18/2016
Study of the theoretical aspects of the typology of television programs. Characterization of the specific features of television. The study of the classification of a television product by functional orientation, television genres by sound specificity.
abstract, added 01/03/2015
Analysis of the specifics of television news. News program release structure. Features of the language of the information program. Comparative analysis of the news programs "24 Hours" and "Today" on the Belarusian television channel "STV" and Russian - "NTV".
term paper, added 04/03/2016
Typology of television programs. The originality of travel programs. Travel journalism: characteristic features. Genre differentiation in journalism. Analysis of genre and compositional features of the cycle. Analysis of the work of the hosts V. Pozner and I. Urgant.
thesis, added 03/14/2015
Analysis of the specifics of cultural and entertainment programs of Soviet television on the example of the programs "Club of Travelers", "Kinopanorama" and "In the Animal World". Genre palette and originality of the problem-thematic complex of cultural and entertainment programs.
thesis, added 12/01/2017
Receptions of information television broadcasting of the programs "News of Afontovo", "X", "News of TVK". The individuality of each program. The specifics of the work of TV journalists of Krasnoyarsk news programs: presenter, reporter, cameraman, director.
Famous TV presenter Boris Notkin has passed away at the age of 75. He is known to the general public through the program of the TVC channel “Boris Notkin Invites”.
At the age of 76, the famous Russian journalist and TV presenter Boris Notkin left the world. His body with a gunshot wound to the head was found at home in the village of Rozhdestvenno, Odintsovo district, near Moscow.
His body was discovered by his wife, who called the police and an ambulance.
A suicide note was found next to his body: “I am leaving this life voluntarily. Tired of suffering", Notkin wrote.
Earlier in May 2017, Notkin was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer.
In the spring, Notkin complained of severe dizziness and weakness. Doctors assessed his condition as serious and placed him in a hospital. He was diagnosed with cancer. After undergoing treatment, the TV presenter returned home.
In 1966 he graduated from the Faculty of Translation of the Institute of Foreign Languages (now the Moscow State Linguistic University), after graduating from 1966 to 1988 he worked at Moscow State University.
In 1972, he completed his postgraduate studies at the Faculty of History of Lomonosov Moscow State University and defended his dissertation on American historiography.
He translated the dialogues of film director Sergei Fyodorovich Bondarchuk and composer Nino Rota during their joint work on the film Waterloo, translated for Franco Zeffirelli.
In 1989, Literaturnaya Gazeta published an article by Notkin on the inefficiency of Soviet medical propaganda. Notkin was noticed and invited to the Good Evening, Moscow program as a guest. A week later, Notkin again appeared on the air - in place of the host of this program.
In 1989-1994, he was the host of the Good Evening, Moscow program on the Moscow TV channel (on Tuesdays).
In 1990-1997 - the host of the program "Facing the City" (MTK).
In 1997, with the formation of the TV Center channel, he began to make the Boris Notkin Gallery program. In 1999, the program changed its name to "Frontiers", from September 2000 the program again became known as "Boris Notkin Invites". The program was released until March 2015.
He was nominated for the TEFI television award in 1995 and 1996.
In 2004, he noted: “Television, unfortunately, is very dependent on what is expected of it. Both society as a whole and the ruling elite. Today's ruling elite (by this expression I mean not only the Kremlin, but the entire elite) would absolutely not want to have the television that was ten years ago - democratic and self-willed. And television meets these needs. Unfortunately they are long term. But at the same time, television also responds to the mood of the people, who are tired of endless poking and want to be calmed down, not upset. But these moods, I think, the audience will soon pass.
Boris Notkin invites
In 2007, the Boris Notkin Invites program was one of the five most popular programs on the TV Center channel.
In June 2007, he was awarded the medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, I degree, for his great contribution to the development of domestic television and many years of work. In November 2011 he was awarded the Order of Friendship.
In the last years of his life, he regularly appeared with his articles on the pages of the Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper, in the Free Topic section.
Illness and death of Boris Notkin:
In May 2017, he went to the doctors, he was worried about weakness and dizziness. Doctors came to the conclusion that Notkin's chronic disease worsened. The condition of the journalist was assessed as serious, and he was placed in a hospital. Later, the presenter returned home, but it soon became clear that the journalist had an incurable disease. He was diagnosed with grade 4 cancer.
On November 11, 2017, he was found dead from a gunshot wound in his house in the village of Rozhdestvenno, Odintsovo district, Moscow region. The wife found the body, next to it lay a gun bought two weeks before her death for self-defense.
According to Evgenia Kiryushina, the official representative of the head of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Moscow Region, “At about 19:00, a message was received about the discovery of a man with a gunshot wound in a private house in the Odintsovo district.” A suicide note was found at the scene of the incident, in which Notkin said that he was tired of suffering and died voluntarily.
Personal life of Boris Notkin:
Was married. Married late - at 48 years old. Wife - Irina Ivanovna Notkina.
“My wife has a wonderful aura. When she is around, studying English or chopping cabbage, I immediately feel good, ”he said.
Was fond of tennis. At one time, he played in tandem with Nikolai Karachentsov against Boris Yeltsin and Shamil Tarpishchev.
“Paired with Nikolai Karachentsov, he fought against Boris Nikolayevich and Shamil Tarpishchev. I had no illusions about Yeltsin. But during the match, my hand was still trembling. After all, you are playing against the president of the country! His wife, Naina Iosifovna, evoked sincere admiration from me. She carried a huge load, because her husband was not at all an easy passenger, but she inspired him, protected him, loved him, ”Notkin said in an interview.
He had numerous awards and titles: Order of Friendship (November 16, 2011) - for great services in the development of domestic television and radio broadcasting and many years of fruitful activity; Medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, I degree (June 27, 2007) - for a great contribution to the development of domestic television and many years of fruitful work; Medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, II degree (August 30, 1996) - for services to the state, many years of fruitful activity in the field of culture and art, a great contribution to the development of mass sports; Medal "Defender of Free Russia" (March 18, 1993) - for the performance of civic duty in the defense of democracy and the constitutional order on August 19 - 21, 1991; Honorary title "Honored Worker of Culture of the Russian Federation" (May 19, 2003) - for merits in the field of culture and many years of fruitful work.
