The Cherry Orchard is one of the most popular and famous works written by Anton Pavlovich Chekhov. It reflects many negative socio-historical phenomena of the state system of that time, such as the moral impoverishment and degradation of the nobility, the emergence of capitalism, and with it the emergence of a new class - the bourgeoisie. And no matter how sad it sounds, the main theme of the work was the fate of all of Russia, which is associated with the cherry orchard. The reader gets up from the pages of the history of the life of the people of Tsarist Rus', which invariably went to rebirth.
In this play, Ranevskaya and her brother Gaev are representatives of the past, Lopakhin is the present, Anya and Trofim are the future.
All the events of the work take place on the estate of Lyubov Andreevna Ranevskaya, where a cherry orchard occupies a large area of land. Everything is sold because of the numerous debts of the hostess. She returned home from abroad just in time for spring, when the whole garden is in white, starlings playfully sing, the sky is blue-blue. Nature is being renewed, and with it, Ranevskaya is enveloped in hopes for a new and happy life. She admiringly admires: “All, all white! Oh my garden!
For the future owner, the merchant Lopakhin, this cherry orchard is not only an object of a bargain, but something more. He says that he has never met anything more beautiful than this estate, because his grandfather was a serf here.
If we take up the description of the artistic portrait of the main character, then we are faced with an image that at first glance seems very sweet and attractive. Ranevskaya really sincerely and touchingly rejoices, has fun, and sometimes she will cry at the memories of her childhood or her son who died.
What was Ranevskaya really like? "The Cherry Orchard" (including the characterization of the heroine) literally immediately, in just a few strokes, makes clear all the frivolity of her nature. She behaves too affectedly, so you can immediately doubt the sincerity of her experiences.
She constantly jumps up and walks, very excited, says that she cannot survive this joy, while kissing the closet and saying: “Laugh at me, I'm stupid ...”.
The characterization of Ranevskaya ("The Cherry Orchard") suggests that she is self-critical and quite smart, but accustomed to living at the expense of others. She is no longer able to change anything in herself, so she became a slave to circumstances, whims and a worthless person who robbed her.
Ranevskaya herself understands that she is a spender who quickly and senselessly spends money, while her adopted daughter Varya feeds the household with milk soup, and the old people in the kitchen are given one pea.
Analyzing further the topic we touched upon, namely “Ranevskaya (“The Cherry Orchard”): characterization of the heroine”, we note that Lyubov Andreevna at first does not pay any attention to telegrams from Paris from her boyfriend and even tears them up until she finds out the name of the buyer of her estate . And then she leaves everyone to the mercy of fate (and her girls, Anya and Varya too) and leaves for Paris with the last money. In this city, she was going to live on the funds that Ani's grandmother sent to buy the estate. Everyone understands that they will be enough for her for a short time.
This behavior allegedly justifies the fact that her love for a dishonest person is to blame for everything. But this is hardly a high feeling, on the contrary, there is something base, repulsive, even somewhere funny in it.
Further, the characterization of Ranevskaya ("The Cherry Orchard") indicates that she is selfish and very impractical, and she herself says that she is below love. However, there is something very feminine, light and attractive in her, she is sweet, kind and sympathetic. But gradually all this, along with a sense of beauty, fades away.
Lopakhin sincerely treats Ranevskaya, he sympathizes with her and shares her enthusiasm for the extraordinary beauty of the cherry orchard, and all because he is a very sensitive and gentle person.
However, Ranevskaya was not destined to save the garden dear to her heart, since it does not have that commercial vein and she will not be able to make it profitable again, as it was almost half a century ago. This fact is emphasized by her remark “... It used to be that dried cherries were carried in carts and sent to Moscow and Kharkov. There was money!
As a result, Ranevskaya sells the cherry orchard and the beauty that cannot protect itself. And therefore, everything must disappear, and along with this, something very important and secret is irretrievably gone.
Her brother Gaev looks just as helpless, who only in his own eyes remained an eminently aristocrat. He practically does not notice Lopakhin and considers him a boor who needs to be put in his place.
However, whatever the characterization of Ranevskaya, Chekhov conceived The Cherry Orchard precisely as a comedy, and, perhaps, it was the theatrical and directorial production that exaggerated the colors too much. Who knows?! Or maybe life should be treated as carefree, easy and fun, as the main character did?
Anya is one of the truly sincere and open characters in A.P. Chekhov's play, which has become a classic of Russian fiction.
The image and characterization of Anya Trofimova in the play "The Cherry Orchard" is a hope for the spiritual rebirth of Russia.
Anya Ranevskaya is not the main character of the work. She is assigned a role of secondary importance, she complements the plot of the play, helps to understand the problem raised by the author of the play. A.P. Chekhov himself tries to characterize the role of the character in his letters. In one of the letters, he says that Anya's role is "short and uninteresting." This young and thin girl is an example of childishness, naivety and burning hopes for a better life. For actors, the author simplifies the task. In his opinion, it can be "played by anyone." The main thing is external similarity. Youth, a sonorous voice, the ability to hold back tears and be cheerful and carefree. But if you do not think about the significance of literature, you can deny the importance of many insignificant characters. Anna cannot be removed from the text. It helps to understand the character of many heroes:
Communicating with each character, Anya emphasizes its negative sides, emphasizes individuality.
Anya is 17 years old, she has not yet matured and feels like a naive child in her soul. Anya's mother is an impoverished noblewoman who does not understand the complexity of her position. She is in the air, making plans that are not destined to come true. Part of her demeanor passed on to her daughter. Anya flew in a balloon in Paris, she admires ordinary things, enjoys life and does not understand people. Anya spent most of her life abroad. She was educated by a governess of French origin with an unknown past. Governess Charlotte is a circus performer. It cannot be assumed that her knowledge is sufficient for a girl. Anya independently searched for what helped her become interesting and educated. She read a lot, looking for correct life principles in books. The books did their job: the girl grew up enthusiastic and emotional. She easily succumbs to the ideas of Peter, believes his every word. The young man was the teacher of the deceased brother, but it is likely that his lessons were also interesting for Anya.
The daughter loves her mother very much, she chooses the most tender words for her: beautiful, kind, good. Anya loves her half-sister Varya, she treats her as affectionately as her mother: beautiful, darling.
Ranevskaya is friends with Peter Trofimov. Young people talk, looking for the meaning of happiness and freedom. They do not accept the possibility of feelings of love between them, trying to deny love in existence. Their goal is a bright star that shines in the distance and beckons them with its light. The author does not give the exact content of their conversations. The reader is forced to guess what the heroes of the play dream about. There is only fragmentary data of their hopes:
A bright future is tempting, but very vague. It is clear that young people are not afraid of changes in life. Anya is ready for work, study, exams. But she, hoping for Peter, does not notice his isolation from reality. The eternal student has many words, but few actions. The author hopes that the energy of the girl, his desire to find the meaning of life will help "ideological" people (such as Peter). Their inner strength is not enough to spread their knowledge, and "Ani" will become the driving force, "pushers" and helpers.
The play describes the loss of a beautiful old cherry orchard. Few objects from the author give the reader the opportunity to imagine real beauty. Anya grew up in a quiet estate, among beautiful trees. It was nature that allowed the girl to maintain the purity of her soul and thoughts. Young Russia is a new cherry orchard, it is the aroma of freedom and movement towards a dream. Anya will help her loved ones, she will change the usual way of life of the nobility. The girl will be able to start working and achieve her goals not with the help of rich relatives, but on her own, like a truly happy person.
The writing
A.P. Chekhov's play "The Cherry Orchard" is one of his best works. The action of the play takes place on the estate of the landowner Lyubov Andreevna Ranevskaya, on an estate with a cherry orchard surrounded by poplars, with a long alley that "goes straight, straight, like an outstretched belt" and "glistens on moonlit nights." This garden is going to be sold because of the numerous debts of L. A. Ranevskaya. She does not want to agree that the garden should be sold for summer cottages.
Ranevskaya, devastated by love, returns to her estate in the spring. In the cherry orchard doomed to bidding - "white masses of flowers", starlings sing, above the garden - blue sky. Nature is preparing for renewal - hopes for a new, pure life awaken in the soul of Ranevskaya: “All, all white! O my garden! After a dark, rainy autumn and a cold winter, you are young again, full of happiness, the angels of heaven will not leave you ... If only I could remove a heavy stone from my chest and shoulders, if I could forget my past! And for the merchant Lopakhin, the cherry orchard means something more than an object of a profitable commercial deal. Having become the owner of a garden and a manor, he experiences an enthusiastic state ... He bought an estate, which is more beautiful than anything in the world!
Ranevskaya is impractical, selfish, she is petty and went in her love interest, but she is also kind, sympathetic, her sense of beauty does not fade. Lopakhin sincerely wants to help Ranevskaya, expresses genuine sympathy for her, shares her passion for the beauty of the cherry orchard. The role of Lopakhin is central - he is a gentle person.
It was not given to Ranevskaya to save the garden from destruction, and not because she was unable to turn the cherry orchard into a commercial, profitable one, as it was 40-50 years ago: “... It used to be that dried cherries were carted and sent to Moscow and Kharkov . There was money!
When they only talk about the possibility of a sale, Ranevskaya "tearing the telegram without reading it" when the buyer is already called - Ranevskaya, before breaking the telegram, reads it, and that's when the auction took place - Ranevskaya does not tear the telegrams and, accidentally dropping one of them, confesses her decision to go to Paris to the man who robbed and abandoned her, confesses her love for this man. In Paris, she is going to live on the money that Anina's grandmother sent to buy the estate. Ranevskaya turned out to be below the idea of a cherry orchard, she betrays her.
The comedy "The Cherry Orchard" is considered Chekhov's top work. The play reflects such a socio-historical phenomenon of the country as the degradation of the "nest of the nobility", the moral impoverishment of the nobility, the development of feudal relations into capitalist ones, and after this - the emergence of a new, ruling class of the bourgeoisie. The theme of the play is the fate of the motherland, its future. "The whole of Russia is our garden." The past, present and future of Russia, as it were, rises from the pages of the play "The Cherry Orchard". The representative of the present in Chekhov's comedy is Lopakhin, the past - Ranevskaya and Gaev, the future - Trofimov and Anya.
Starting from the first act of the play, the rottenness and worthlessness of the owners of the estate - Ranevskaya and Gaev - are exposed. Lyubov Andreevna Ranevskaya, in my opinion, is a rather empty woman. She does not see anything around her but love interests, she strives to live beautifully, carefree. She is simple, charming, kind. But her kindness is purely external. The essence of her nature is in selfishness and frivolity: Ranevskaya distributes gold, while poor Varya, out of "savings, feeds everyone with milk soup, in the kitchen they give old people one pea"; arranges an unnecessary ball when there is nothing to pay debts. He remembers the dead son, speaks of maternal feelings, love. And she herself leaves her daughter in the care of a careless uncle, does not worry about the future of her daughters. She resolutely tears telegrams from Paris, at first without even reading them, and then she goes to Paris. She is saddened by the sale of the estate, but rejoices at the possibility of going abroad. And when he talks about love for the motherland, he interrupts himself with the remark: “However, you must drink coffee.” For all her weakness, lack of will, she has the ability for self-criticism, for disinterested kindness, for sincere, ardent feeling.
The present Russia in Chekhov's play "The Cherry Orchard" is represented by Lopakhin. In general, his image is complex and contradictory. He is resolute and compliant, prudent and poetic, truly kind and unconsciously cruel. Such are the many facets of his nature and character. Throughout the play, the hero constantly repeats about his origin, saying that he is a peasant: “My father, however, was a peasant, but here I am in a white vest and yellow shoes. With a pig’s snout in a kalashny row ... Only now he’s rich, there’s a lot of money, but if you think and figure it out, then a peasant is a peasant ... ”Although, it seems to me, he still exaggerates his common people, because he already came from the family of a village kulak-shopkeeper. Lopakhin himself says: “... my late father - he then traded here in the village in a shop ...” Yes, and he himself is currently a very successful businessman. According to him, it can be judged that things are even going very well with him and there is no need to complain about his life and his fate in relation to money.
In his image, all the features of an entrepreneur, a businessman, personifying the present state of Russia, its structure are visible. Lopakhin is a man of his time, who saw the real chain of development of the country, its structure and was drawn into the life of society. He lives for today.
Chekhov notes the kindness of the merchant, his desire to become better. Ermolai Alekseevich remembers how Ranevskaya stood up for him when his father offended him as a child. Lopakhin recalls this with a smile: “Don’t cry, he says, little man, he will heal before the wedding ... (Pause.) Little man ...” He sincerely loves her, willingly lends Lyubov Andreevna money, not expecting to ever receive them. For her sake, he tolerates Gaev, who despises and ignores him. The merchant strives to improve his education, to learn something new. At the beginning of the play, he is shown with a book in front of the readers. Regarding this, Yermolai Alekseevich says: “I was reading a book and did not understand anything. Read and fell asleep.
Yermolai Lopakhin, the only one in the play busy with business, leaves for his merchant needs. In one of the conversations about this, you can hear: "I now, at five o'clock in the morning, go to Kharkov." He differs from others in his vitality, diligence, optimism, assertiveness, practicality. Alone, he proposes a real plan to save the estate.
Lopakhin may seem like a clear contrast to the old masters of the cherry orchard. After all, he is a direct descendant of those whose faces "look from every cherry tree in the garden." Yes, and how can he triumph after buying a cherry orchard: “If my father and grandfather got up from their graves and looked at the whole incident, like their Yermolai, beaten, illiterate Yermolai, who ran barefoot in winter, how this same Yermolai bought the estate where grandfather and father were slaves, where they were not even allowed into the kitchen. I'm sleeping, it only seems to me, it only seems to me ... Hey, musicians, play, I want to listen to you! Everyone come and watch how Yermolai Lopakhin will hit the cherry orchard with an ax, how the trees will fall to the ground! We will set up dachas, and our grandchildren and great-grandchildren will see a new life here ... Music, play!” But this is not so, because in the place of something ruined it is impossible to build something beautiful, joyful and happy.
And here Chekhov also discovers the negative qualities of the bourgeois Lopakhin: his desire to get rich, not to miss his profit. He still buys Ranevskaya's estate himself and puts into practice his idea of organizing dachas. Anton Pavlovich showed how acquisitiveness gradually cripples a person, becoming his second nature. “Just as in terms of metabolism, a predatory beast is needed that eats everything that comes in its way, so you are needed,” Petya Trofimov explains to the merchant about his role in society. And yet Ermolai Alekseevich is simple and kind, from the bottom of his heart he offers help to the “eternal student”. It is not for nothing that Petya likes Lopakhin - for his thin, gentle, like an artist's fingers, for his "thin, tender soul." But it is he who advises him "not to wave his arms", not to be carried away, imagining that everything can be bought and sold. And Yermolai Lopakhin, the further, the more he learns the habit of “waving his arms.” At the beginning of the play, this is still not so pronounced, but at the end it becomes quite noticeable. His confidence that everything can be considered in terms of money increases and becomes more and more his feature.
The story of Lopakhin's relationship with Varya does not evoke sympathy. Varya loves him. And he seems to like her, Lopakhin understands that his proposal will be her salvation, otherwise she will go to the housekeeper. Ermolai Alekseevich is going to take a decisive step and does not take it. It is not entirely clear what prevents him from proposing to Varya. Either this is the lack of true love, or it is his excessive practicality, or maybe something else, but in this situation he does not cause sympathy for himself.
He is characterized by enthusiasm and merchant arrogance after the purchase of the Ranevskaya estate. Having acquired a cherry orchard, he solemnly and boastfully announces this, cannot help but praise, but the tears of the former mistress suddenly shake him. Lopakhin’s mood changes, and he bitterly says: “Oh, if only all this would pass, if only our awkward, unhappy life would somehow change.” The triumph that has not yet died out is combined with mockery of oneself, merchant dashing - with spiritual awkwardness.
Another feature of him does not make a good impression. First of all, this is his indelicateness, the desire for the fastest profit. He starts cutting trees even before the former owners have left. No wonder Petya Trofimov says to him: “Really, is there really not enough tact ...” The felling of the cherry orchard is stopped. But as soon as the former owners left the estate, the axes clattered again. The new owner is in a hurry to turn his idea into action.
Representatives of the future of Russia are Trofimov and Anya. Pyotr Trofimov correctly looks at many life phenomena, is able to captivate with figurative, deep thought, and under his influence Anya quickly grows spiritually. But Petya's words about the future, his calls to work, to be free as the wind, to go forward are vague, they are too general, dreamy. Petya believes in "higher happiness", but he does not know how to achieve it. It seems to me that Trofimov is the image of a future revolutionary.
The Cherry Orchard was written by Chekhov during the period of pre-revolutionary unrest. The writer confidently believed in the onset of a better future, in the inevitability of the revolution. He considered the young generation of Russia to be the creators of a new, happy life. In the play The Cherry Orchard, these people are Petya Trofimov and Anya. The revolution has come to pass, a “bright future” has come, but it has not brought the “higher happiness” to the people.
All of Russia at the beginning of the 20th century, in my opinion, was reflected in Chekhov's play. And now you can meet such impractical people who have lost their ground under their feet, like Ranevskaya and Gaev. Idealists like Petya Trofimov and Anya are also alive, but it’s quite difficult to meet people like Chekhov’s Lopakhin: modern entrepreneurs very often lack those attractive personality traits that I liked in this hero. Unfortunately, in our society, "Yasha's lackeys" come to the fore every day more and more confidently. There is not a word about this hero in my essay, since I am limited by the time of the examination work. I could say a lot about him, and about other characters in Chekhov's play The Cherry Orchard, since this work provides inexhaustible material for reflection on the fate of Russia.
Past Ranevskaya
Noblewoman. landowner. At one time, "she married a barrister, not a nobleman" and, according to Gaev, "behaved, it can not be said that she was very virtuous."
Six years ago, her husband died (“he drank terribly”), she fell in love with another person. A month later, the seven-year-old son Grisha drowned. Ranevskaya could not bear it, she left. “Mom couldn’t bear it, she left, left without looking back.”
Her new lover went after her. Lived abroad for five years. I bought a cottage near Menton. He fell ill there, she took care of him for three years. Then she went bankrupt, sold her dacha, and left for Paris.
He robbed her and went to another. His love, by her own admission, tormented her. She tried to poison herself. “My soul has dried up,” she says of herself.
Anya tells Varya: “We are coming to Paris, it’s cold there, it’s snowing. I speak French terribly. Mom lives on the fifth floor, I come to her, she has some French, ladies, an old priest with a book, and it's smoky and uncomfortable. I suddenly felt sorry for my mother, so sorry, I hugged her head, squeezed her hands and could not let go. Mom then caressed everything, cried ... "
What a contrast this French dwelling of Ranevskaya looks like in comparison with her estate: some people, smoky, uncomfortable. And in the middle of it all, a priest!
Let's think about it: Ranevskaya lost her son and, unable to bear it, as Anya says, she left. But we note that she left her twelve-year-old daughter, leaving her in the care of nineteen-year-old Varya.
Having lost one child due to circumstances, she leaves the second of her own free will. She leaves the girl practically an orphan. From twelve to seventeen, Anya grows up alone. Whereas it is at this age (and not only at this age) that a girl needs a mother! Did Ranevskaya think about this?
It is believed that Ranevskaya, returning to Russia, runs away from her unhappy love, as she once ran away from her from Russia. But she doesn't come by herself! Behind her (and for what else?) Her daughter went. Would Ranevskaya return to this house, to this garden so beloved in words, if Anya had not gone to her (follow her) herself? Maybe, after all, there, in smoky rooms, with a series of familiar and unfamiliar faces, she was not so bad as it might seem now?
Maybe Varya is so unhappy because the whole house is left on her? She did her duty (it sounds too high), she helped Anya grow up, and who will help her? She was not accustomed to rely on anyone, only on herself. And to God. Maybe that's why she became so pious that there was no help from people.
What about uncle? Did he help? Why was the estate ruined? No answer. But, on the other hand, it is on the surface. Who took care of him? Who needed it? Varya was unable to do so.
Real Ranevskaya
So, Ranevskaya returned home after a five-year absence. I am glad to see my home again, because here she spent her childhood. “I slept here when I was little ... And now I’m like a little ...” (Laughs.) I want to jump, wave my arms ... I can’t sit still, unable to ... (Jumps up and walks in great excitement.)
He speaks joyfully, through tears; cries, kisses Varia, brother, Dunyasha.
Her estate is ruined, auctions are scheduled for August 22, but she does nothing to save it. Moreover, despite the fact that she is ruined, Ranevskaya squanders money. He gives Pishchik a loan, gives a hundred rubles to a stranger.
Anya says: “I also didn’t have a penny left, I barely got there. And my mom doesn't understand! We sit down at the station to dine, and she demands the most expensive thing and gives the lackeys a ruble for tea. Varya: "If she had freedom, she would give everything away."
The symbol of Ranevskaya and her life is coffee. Expensive, refined drink. Symbol of prosperity. She is broke, but she cannot refuse coffee. And he doesn't want to.
Ranevskaya about the garden
“What an amazing garden! White masses of flowers, blue sky…”; “The garden is all white. Oh my childhood, my purity! I slept in this nursery, looked at the garden from here, happiness woke up with me every morning, and then it was exactly like that, nothing has changed. (Laughs with joy.) All, all white! O my garden! After a dark rainy autumn and a cold winter, you are young again, full of happiness, the angels of heaven have not left you ... If only I could remove a heavy stone from my chest and shoulders, if I could forget my past!
The garden for Ranevskaya is the last outlet, the last refuge, the last happiness, all that she has left. Ranevskaya cannot cut down the garden and destroy the house! Let's remember how she reacts to Lopakhin's proposal: “Knock it out? My dear, I'm sorry, you do not understand anything. If there is anything interesting, even remarkable, in the whole province, it is only our cherry orchard.
Let's pay attention to the symbolism of color: the garden is all white. White - pure, untouched, spiritual, immaculate. “White color symbolizes purity, spotlessness, innocence, virtue, joy. It is associated with daylight ... The idea of \u200b\u200bexplicit, generally accepted, legal, true is associated with whiteness.
Looking at the garden, Ranevskaya exclaims: “Oh my childhood, my purity!” The White Garden is a symbol of childhood and purity of the heroine, a symbol of happiness. But the last part of Ranevskaya's monologue sounds tragic. She talks about the autumn and winter that the garden has experienced. After autumn and winter, awakening inevitably comes in nature, spring comes.
Leaves reappear, flowers bloom. “You are young again, full of happiness.” And the man? Man, unfortunately, is arranged differently. And we will never be able to say: “I am young again. Childhood, youth cannot be returned. The past is impossible to forget. Misfortunes and sorrows cannot leave without a trace. Absolutely from scratch, a person cannot, probably, start living. That's why he's a man. And the last exclamation of Ranevskaya is confirmation of this.
This is the pain that childhood has passed, youth has passed, moreover, life has passed, and not in the best way. And when did it happen? How, where and with whom did life pass?
Ranevskaya, on the one hand, is very sorry. Especially at the moment when Petya Trofimov ruthlessly throws in her face: “Whether the estate is sold today or not sold, does it matter? It has long been finished with him, there is no turning back, the path is overgrown. Calm down, dear. Do not deceive yourself, you must at least once in your life look the truth straight in the eye.
The garden for her is childhood, youth, happiness, and she cannot erase these memories, she cannot so easily abandon her garden. “After all, I was born here, my father and mother lived here, my grandfather, I love this house, I don’t understand my life without a cherry orchard, and if you really need to sell it, then sell me along with the garden ... (Hugs Trofimov, kisses him on the forehead). After all, my son drowned here ... (Crying.) Have pity on me, good, kind person.
But at the same time, Peter is right! Ranevskaya is too dependent on her memories, on her past. She does not want to face the truth, does not want to understand, for example, that the garden has long been a memory, and her lover is a scoundrel.
Of course, Trofimov is harsh. But he tells the truth, which Ranevskaya does not want to listen to.
Does that mean there is no way out? There is an exit. You just need to stop and think, rethink your life, your actions, listen to yourself and make some effort on yourself.
I also recall the words of Gaev that his sister is vicious ... What is Ranevskaya in reality? Why does her brother talk about her like that? Some details can only be guessed at.
Is Ranevskaya ready to change, is she ready to realize why she needs all this? I think not. Varya, for example, says about her: "Mommy is still the same as she was, has not changed at all."
Can the house in which she spent her childhood and the garden help Ranevskaya find peace, restore lost happiness? Let's pay attention to how she reacts to telegrams coming to her from Paris.
"Varya. Here, mommy, two telegrams for you ...
R a n e in with ka I. This is from Paris. (Tears the telegrams without reading them.) It's over with Paris.
He doesn't read the telegram. Is the past over?
Thus, whatever the result of the auction, Ranevskaya would have left anyway. This decision was made, as we see, much earlier than the sale of the estate. Neither "the whole white garden" nor anyone else would help her find happiness. She returned to her garden, but it is impossible to return to her youth and start all over again.
Does Ranevskaya have a choice? Undoubtedly. A person always has a choice. Live as before (with a villain who robs and tortures her), or stay here. Yes, the garden will be sold (if she decides to do so), but something more important will remain. For example, daughter.
But, stopping at a certain point, she did not move towards her happiness, but went in the same circle: Paris, he, rude love with betrayal, betrayal, scenes of jealousy, tears, a desire to commit suicide, “some French, ladies, an old priest with a book, and smoky, and uncomfortable. After that, who to blame for your failed life?
The future of Ranevskaya
Everything is clear with the future of Ranevskaya. But what future does Ranevskaya prepare for her daughter Anya, still so young, open and naive? Some remarks make you think that Anya is very similar to her mother.
Probably the same dreamy, enthusiastic, wanting to fly and enjoy life. Ranevskaya, like her daughter, dreamed of happiness, love ... And she didn’t think about the bad, and it seemed that there would never be troubles and hardships ... Where did it all go if Ranevskaya was exactly like that? Did she think life would turn out that way?
0 / 5. 0
