The term “anti-Semitism” is used today in the most ridiculous way: in fact, Arabs are also Semites, therefore, anyone who does not like them falls into the category of anti-Semites. The modern meaning of this term is associated with at least three misconceptions.
1. The first and most important misconception is anti-Semitism itself. It consists of demonizing Jews and attributing all kinds of evil to them. Supporters of anti-Semitism also claim that Jews rule the world, that they have some kind of center striving for world domination, the destruction of our civilization, etc. Sometimes various crimes are attributed to them completely unfoundedly. Anti-Semites have an inherent desire to eradicate everything Jewish from our civilization.
It should be clear that this is a shameful prejudice.
Take the last postulate: the demand to “cleanse” European culture of Jewish elements. This is absurd. There is no European culture without Christianity, and Christianity is based on the Hebrew Bible and follows the teachings of Christ, who was a Jew. Therefore, anti-Semites are very often also anti-Christians - without realizing that they are destroying the foundations of the culture they want to protect. The significance of Jews is not limited to Christianity. Many famous European thinkers of the 19th and 20th centuries were Jewish; Let's name at least Marx, Freud and Einstein. If we talk about philosophy, then almost everything that played a decisive role in emerging from the dark corner of the “new” history comes from the Jews. For example, philosophers such as Bergson (Zbytkover), Husserl, Cassirer, Lévi-Strauss and Tarski were Jews. True, many leading communists were Jews, but the outstanding French anti-communist Raymond Aron was also a Jew. Without Jews, European culture does not exist, therefore anti-Semitism is an extremely anti-European superstition.
Naturally, the question arises why anti-Semitism is so widespread, even in those countries where Jews constitute a small and well-assimilated minority, as was the case, for example, in pre-war Germany - where anti-Semitism reached its limit. This question is not easy to answer; We can probably talk about several reasons. One of them is envy, caused by the fact that among Jews there is a high percentage of very gifted people who occupy leading positions in literature, science, philosophy and even politics. Another reason is that among the Jews there are quite a lot of people who become intolerant and merciless as soon as they gain power (which manifests itself, among other things, in disdain for the religious and patriotic feelings of the “goyim”). It is they who should be considered primarily responsible for the spread of anti-Semitism. In the 20th century, many people of this type exercised power on behalf of communist parties, and crimes committed by communists were then attributed to all Jews, which, of course, is a misconception, but nevertheless partly explains the popularity of anti-Semitism.
2. Along with this basic superstition, another one should be mentioned, which believes that anti-Semitism is something worse and more criminal than national enmity. This refers to German anti-Semitism, which led to the genocide of the Jews and in this sense was undoubtedly worse than, for example, the hostility of the Flemings towards the Walloons in Belgium. However, the genocide to which the Armenians fell victims after the First World War deserves condemnation to the same extent. Perhaps the double scale in the assessment is associated with the idea of the “chosenness” of Jews, which, however, today the majority of Jews themselves do not believe.
3. Finally, the opinion that one cannot love Jews less than others is a prejudice, and if someone prefers an Italian or a Chinese to a Jew, then he is an anti-Semite. Everyone has the right to love or not love someone, provided that the law is respected in relation to the person who is not loved. Every person not only has the right, but is simply obliged to love close people more than distant ones, for example, to love Poles more than the French or Jews. And anyone who calls people who have such feelings anti-Semites becomes a victim of superstition.
Great definition
Incomplete definition ↓
one of the attempts to concretize world evil, to search for an antitotem, the idea that evil is embodied in Jews who deliberately and viciously destroy and disorganize life. A. is one of the forms of the syncretic embryo of self-criticism. The history of A. is the history of the uncomfortable states of the corresponding subject A. A. is characterized by the pagan identification of evil with its bearer. A. is a vivid example of anti-mediation, archaization of culture, and the desire to destroy sociocultural innovations.
Inside A. there is always a struggle between its different versions, which is one of the aspects of the struggle of moral ideals to assert their dominance in society. Jews are usually identified with that pole of moral opposition, the moral ideal that is hit by the inversion wave and opposes it. Jews can be identified with the bourgeoisie if the attack is directed against utilitarianism, or with the bureaucracy if the attack is directed against authoritarianism with its suppression of initiative, creative work, etc. A. constantly takes the form of dual oppositions.
One of the poles evaluates Jews as bourgeois, ready to exploit the whole world, greedy traders, etc. Another, on the contrary, views the Jew as a communist commissar who seeks to expropriate labor property, drive all dissenters behind bars, etc. The Jew is valued both as Trotsky and as Rothschild. In Africa there is a constant struggle between the assessments of the Jew as a rootless, rootless cosmopolitan and as an extreme nationalist seeking to subjugate all other peoples. Jews can be considered as enemies of Christianity and at the same time Christianity itself - as a Jewish sect, and the adoption of Christianity in Rus' as a result of the machinations of Jews destroying the pagan purity of Russian culture, etc. Stalin can be regarded positively as a fighter against the Jews and at the same time as a pawn in the hands of the “Kaganovichs”. Jews in Africa constantly merge with the idea of evil common in this subculture, for example, with the West, the bosses, the cooperator, the mafia, etc. A. is a form of resistance to the penetration of external cultural influences into the life of “We”. There is constant work going on to interpret any negative phenomena as the result of the activities of Jews - from AIDS and accidents to the spread of Lysenkoism and the ruin of Russian culture; from assessing capitalism and the Soviet system as the work of Jews to accusing Jews of secretly or openly spreading their sign systems, for example, hexagons, etc. This list is always open to new ideas, i.e. it includes not only old archaic ideas about ruined Christian babies, but also modernized ideas about the guilt of Jews in scientific and technological progress and its negative consequences, in the existence of liberal civilization in general.
At the same time, the Jewish origin of all people negatively assessed in the corresponding system of ideas is proven. Batu Khan, Hitler, Sakharov, Beria, Yeltsin, the entire Soviet leadership and anyone in general can get here, to the point that the entire Soviet official system is declared Jewish. In this regard, A. makes a distinction, dating back to Dostoevsky, between a Jew as a separate person, who can well be assessed as a “good person,” and Jewry, i.e.
some substance of evil that arises only in the process of communication between Jews.
A. acts as a specific language that can be used in society to “expose” the sociocultural, political “enemy,” reduce the hostile ideal, and identify it with a shameful and self-evident carrier of evil that is understandable to the people. It is clear that if a Jew can in some sense not be a Jew, i.e. a bearer of evil, then any non-Jew can become a Jew if he falls into the sphere of influence of this substance.
Here, in principle, there are no restrictions, to the point that anyone who does not join A., to the corresponding version of it, can be declared to have waited. This includes everyone who is allegedly influenced by Jews - those who are bribed, who carry out their orders, who succumb to provocations, who fall under the influence of foreign radio, etc., as well as people who have Jews in any degree of kinship, i.e. who can become infected with world evil through “nature,” through things, through words, etc. Hence, by the way, such exceptional mass interest in the nationality of ancestors, wives, etc. Evil has absolute fluidity, i.e. the ability to seep anywhere and everywhere. This opens up unlimited possibilities for including Jews in any social group - from the ruling elite, the intelligentsia, to part of the Russian people, citing the fact that their ancestors were Cantonist Jews, etc. However, in different sociocultural situations, the emphasis may be on different aspects, for example, mainly on religious, ethnic, social, etc.
A. acts as an attempt to emotionally color the bearer of evil, to reveal his everyday presence, which in one form or another makes it possible, as once during the fight against witches and sorcerers, to suspect a werewolf in everyone, even the closest person, in this case a Jew . A.
resists mediation in the interpenetration of local worlds, ethnic groups, peoples, etc. acts as a form of struggle against innovations that are dangerous to traditionalism. It is aimed at returning to the ideals of localism on a tribal basis, which can be used to extrapolate it to a larger society, for the formation and reproduction of a syncretic state. A. is the result of a combination of local tribal ideals and an abstract - Manichaean type of opposition between “We” as the subject of good and “They” as the bearer of evil. The mechanism of A. should be considered on the basis of personification and nationalism. conspiracy theories.
A. is a manifestation of the totemic desire to discover the emotional, empirical form of the bearer of evil. For totemic thinking, evil is an active hostile subject, a werewolf, who serves as the focus of secret and overt forces that cause disorganization. From undifferentiated totemism comes the idea that evil is natural for its bearers, just as the tail of a beaver or the shape of a bird’s nose is natural.
The question of why exactly Jews have this quality in the totemic worldview is as meaningless as the question of why exactly a bear, a dog, a raven, etc. are a totem or antitotem in a particular tribe.
The socio-cultural significance of A. lies in the fact that it constantly tempts various political groups to rely on it, so that the corresponding group can become one of its own for the corresponding part of the population, act as a guarantor against evil, and become some kind of totem - the bearer of good.
The revolutionary organization "People's Will" did not shun calls for pogroms against Jews, trying to fit into the system of mythological ideas. Mass mediation is a particular temptation for the ruling party, which needs mass support to solve the mediation problem. On A.
However, only a state of a traditional type, oriented towards static reproduction, on tribal values opposed to civil society and the rule of law, can rely. A. is associated with the desire to strengthen and restore a syncretic state, while the struggle against A. is associated with the desire for a civil society.
a certain historical situation, for example, in Hitler’s Germany, A.
may become the most important factor in solving the mediation problem. A high level of mass anti-government can manifest itself in accusing the ruling elite of conniving, indulging, aiding Jews, and also in the fact that it actually represents a conductor of Jewish influence in the country. This creates the basis for the authorities’ desire to purge themselves of Jews in order to prove their non-involvement with them. The government, following the mass A., thereby tries to find an important energy source for solving the mediation problem, to act in accordance with the expectations of the mass reference group, and thus tries to overcome the split between the people and the government. However, such attempts are always limited by the danger of national conflicts and the transformation of African practice into a model of interethnic relations.
In the dominant ideology of the first global period, Jews were viewed as “the enemies of Christ.” This was counteracted by an attempt to replace this version of Manichaeism with the opposite, i.e. to the antagonism of the poor: and the rich. In it, being Jewish lost its significance as a moral assessment. This version of Manichaeism won during the transition from the first to the second global period. However, the new government as a result turned out to be vulnerable to attacks by mass A.
Thus, A. turned into an ideological form of interpretation of the bureaucracy as ethnically alien, which, by the way, is a continuation of the desire to identify the tsarist bureaucracy with the Germans. The idea of a Jewish-Masonic conspiracy is a cultural mutation of the moral premises of the inversion scythe of the Manichaean type. Its possibility rests on the growth of Russian nationalism, on the symptoms of the approaching reverse inversion from the dominance of the class form of Manichaeism to the national one. As an ideologically transitional form, one can consider preaching the idea of the existence of “counter-revolutionary” nations (Andreeva N. I can’t give up principles // Soviet Russia, 1988. March 13).
In this situation, the ruling elite of the second global period, during the transition from one stage to the next, constantly fluctuates in relation to A. from fighting it as a crime to trying to make maximum use of it at a certain controlled level, sometimes turning into mass persecution (which was, for example, campaign against cosmopolitans). The collapse of Manichaean ideology at the seventh stage of the second global period (perestroika) undermined the ideological foundations of official A. This opened the way for a certain part of the intelligentsia, striving for the restoration of a syncretic state, to openly raise the banner of A. as a means of mass mobilization of social energy. At the same time, Jews and authorities are identified in a syncretic way.
The empirical absurdity of this thought is not grasped by syncretic consciousness, just as for the tribal totemic consciousness, for the belief in the absolute identity of the bear-totem and man, their empirical difference did not play a significant role. The existence of opposite, consuming each other and at the same time coexisting forms of A. means that the very real behavior in society of those who consider themselves Jews was not really significant for A., just as the real behavior of “enemies of the people”, the behavior of “witches” was not really significant ", accused of causing damage, cohabitation with the devil, etc. Moreover, complete emigration or extermination of the Jews would not have a significant impact on the theory and practice of A.
There would be an anti-Semite, but there would always be a Jew. A.’s separation from specific ethnic Jews is also manifested in the denial by some of the fighters against the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy of their involvement in A. However, it should be taken into account that, firstly, it is impossible to deny the anti-Semitic nature of the fight against ideology, which these fighters identify with national culture Jews
Secondly, mass soil A. does not rise to the difference between Jews and Zionists, Masons, etc. And finally, perhaps most importantly, there is a serious danger that today the growth of Russian national self-awareness is acquiring archaic forms on a significant scale, gravitating toward localist, tribal values, and A. may turn out to be an extremely convenient form of this process.
The secret of A. is known only to some anti-Semites, thereby becoming demagoguery. It lies in the fact that A. serves only as a kind of fuse, a stimulant of mass consciousness for completely different purposes (sailboat effect). For example, the "Doctors' Plot" aimed to turn the anger of the people into the social energy of a wave of mass terror designed to stop the fall of extreme authoritarianism. The secret is that the sociocultural function of A. is the consolidation of archaic, pagan forces based on the fight against a common enemy (real or imaginary - it makes no difference), in the desire of people to unite around the idea of \u200b\u200bbeating the enemy through pogrom, genocide, expulsion. A.
Incomplete definition ↓
Anatoly Glazunov
(Blockade runner)
Russians who
use words
“anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites” are Russians corrupted by the Jews
“We are not anti-Semitic. Many of
we are treated well
Palestinians and other Semites.
We are the enemies of Jewish fascism!”
During the hundred years of their domination (in the bodies of zombies!) over the Russian people, the Jews programmed millions of Russian people to use the words “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites”. And they were programmed to use these words only in the Jewish interpretation. Previously, these words did not exist in the Russian language. What do these words mean in the Jewish interpretation? There is no consensus even among the Jews themselves. The Jews only agree on the fact that “anti-Semitism” is a “negative attitude towards Jews.” The “Concise Jewish Encyclopedia,” a very respectable publication among Jews, explains that “anti-Semitism” is “dislike for Jews.” But most Jewish dictionaries indicate that “anti-Semitism” is “a hostile attitude towards Jews.” And millions of Russian people, zombified by the Jews since childhood, confidently believed and continue to believe that “anti-Semitism is a mental and spiritual illness, a great vice. And these anti-Semites are inferior, flawed people, obscurantists, Black Hundreds, fascists, whom a cultured person should avoid in every possible way.
One stupid zombie asked me: “Are you an anti-Semite?” I say: “What an anti-Semite I am when I have a “calm” attitude towards the Arabs, and even with sympathy for the Palestinians who are fighting the Jews. After all, Arabs, and Palestinians in particular, are also Semites. After all, Jews make up a very small percentage of the Semitic population of the planet. And are the Semites-Palestinians who fight against the Jewish occupation in Palestine also anti-Semites?” The zombie fool (by the way, a candidate of philological sciences) didn’t even think about it, she just got irritated.
Let’s take a closer look at the terms “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites.” “Anti” means “against”. Anti-Semites are those who are against Semites.
Who are the Semites? Where does this word "Semite" come from? The very name “Semites” is derived from the name of one of the sons of the biblical Noah - Shem. According to the Bible, from this Shem many Semitic (Simitic) peoples were formed on Earth. The sons of Israel (they are later the sons of Judah, they are Jews, they are Jews) are just one of the Semitic peoples. Moreover, it is small in number.
In philology, the concept “family of Semitic languages” has long existed. This is a special family of related languages. Peoples who spoke and speak Semitic languages and were called Semitic peoples. These peoples lived and live in that part of Eurasia where Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Palestine and Saudi Arabia are now. These peoples also lived and live in North and East Africa. The ancient Jews used to make up only five percent of the Semitic peoples.
Scientists linguists include Akkadian and the later Assyro-Babylonian language, Aramaic, Phoenician and Hebrew, as well as the languages of many other peoples of ancient Palestine to the Semitic family of languages. Linguists also include the language of the inhabitants of Carthage, the Ethiopian language and the Arabic language as Semitic languages. Many Semitic languages have become “dead languages,” but many have survived. The Arabic and Amharic (“post-Ethiopian”) languages have been preserved as living languages, and remnants of the Aramaic language have also been preserved in Syria. The Hebrew language (Hebrew) almost disappeared, most Jews began to speak Yiddish. This language belongs to the Germanic family of languages, although it had many words from Hebrew. Since 1948, after the restoration of the state of Israel, the Jews began to restore and improve Hebrew, and Hebrew was adopted as the official language of this “temporary” state.
So, many Semitic peoples (Akkadians, Assyrians, Chaldeans, ancient Palestinians, etc.) disappeared forever. But some Semitic peoples survived. These are Arabs, “Arabized” Syrians and Berbers, most of the Ethiopians and Aysors, as well as the Jews (who now call themselves Jews and Israelis).
What else does a Russian person need to know? The word “anti-Semites” was first used by the German publicist W. Marr. In 1880, he began publishing the Free Anti-Semitic Journal in Germany. It was a difficult time for the Germans. In Germany at that time the Jews became extremely strong. And after the defeat in the war, we can say that the Jewish yoke was established in Germany. The Jews set themselves the task of turning “this country” into Jewish Germany. In response to this assertive Jewish expansion, hatred of the Jews intensified among the German people. Those Germans who found it disgusting and humiliating to live “under a Jew” joined the struggle for the liberation of Germany from the Jews. German fascism, led by Adolf Hitler, went against Jewish fascism.
Marr, of course, attached a positive meaning to the words “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites”. This word also had a positive meaning in the minds of all participants in the Anti-Jewish Resistance. “Every progressive German must be an anti-Semite. Anti-Semites are those Germans who set out to put an end to the Jewish dominance in government. Anti-Semites are those Germans who entered the struggle for the liberation of Germany from the Jewish yoke.”
At its core, Marr's magazine was an anti-Jewish magazine, not an anti-Semitic one. Introducing the term “anti-Semites” instead of the terms “Judephobes” and “anti-Jews” was not a wise thing. The term was quite bad. The impression was created that the magazine was against all Semitic peoples, against the entire Semitic race. But in fact, the magazine was only anti-Jewish. Why did Marr need to introduce a new term? There is no clear answer. Was it not because of fear of the Jews that he did not dare to clearly name his publication “Anti-Jewish Journal”? Or did he want to attract the attention of readers with a new term?
From that time on, the Jews in Germany began to be often scolded with a new word - “Semites!”
“Damned Semites! Get out of Germany!
From Germany, the words “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites” flew to the Russian Empire. Who was the first to put these words into circulation in Russia? No answer. Probably one of those developed Russians who gave these words a positive meaning. After all, in Russia at that time there was also an offensive of the Jews against the Russian people. The Jews stubbornly moved towards seizing power in “this country.” The tsars, the government, the church leadership and a large part of the intelligentsia actually betrayed the Russian people. They refused to rouse the people to fight the Jews. Many even began to openly collaborate with the Jews and defend the Jews.
In Russia, as in Germany, those who found it humiliating and disgusting to live “under a Jew” began to call themselves “anti-Semites.” Those who tried to resist the advance of the Jews. In the “Encyclopedic Dictionary” by I. Pavlenko (4th revised edition, St. Petersburg, 1910, p. 122) it is explained: “Anti-Semitism is a socio-political movement directed against Jews as an element, due to their racial, religious and everyday traditions, bringing corruption to the national culture.” This definition is good (after 1917, the Jews will no longer be able to publish even such dictionaries), but it is not sufficient. It should be more complete: “Anti-Semitism is a national movement against Jewish expansion, against the dominance of Jews in the press and government, a movement for liberation from the Jewish yoke.” “Anti-Semitism is a movement against Jewish fascism!”
But the term was still unfortunate, ridiculous, and very inaccurate. There was no need for it. There were already words in the Russian language: Judeophobia and Judophobes, anti-Jewishism and anti-Jewishists, Judeo-borers, Judeo-fighters and Judeo-fighters, Judeo-haters, Judeo-beaters, etc. But it must be said that all these words, especially “Judeophobia” and “Judephobes”, “anti-Semitism” and “ “anti-Semites” are generally not very suitable for widespread use. Let us imagine that during the war with the Germans, propagandists appeared who began to use in print the words “Germanophobia”, “Germanophobes”, “anti-Germanism”, “anti-Germans”. “Germanophobes stopped the German advance near Moscow!” “Anti-Germans defeated the Germans at Stalingrad!” Such propagandists had to be urgently thrown out of the newspapers and sent to penal companies “for idiocy.”
Further, the fate of the terms “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites” was as follows. In Germany, where the German offensive against the Jews began successfully and quickly, these terms had a positive meaning. And so it would have continued, but the Arabs protested. “We, too, are Semites. Does Germany see the Arabs as its enemies? Aren’t many Arabs allies of Germany?” The German Foreign Ministry realized that it was impossible to proclaim “anti-Semitism” as German state policy. We realized that the terms “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites” are not very good terms and should be abandoned.
But now the fate of these terms began to be determined by the Jews and Judaizers in all countries of the planet. The Jews clung to these terms and did not let them disappear. Moreover, these terms became the favorite terms of Jewish propaganda. These terms, of course, were many times more pleasant for the Jewish ear, for the Jewish soul, than the old terms “Judeophobia” and “Judephobes,” “anti-Jewishism,” “anti-Jewishists” and “Jewish fighters.” They didn’t have these unpleasant ones - “Yudo” and “Yid”. And the Jews began, with all their strength, to introduce these terms into the consciousness of all the peoples of the Earth. But, of course, these terms were given a “Jewish meaning.” The zombification of peoples was most successful in those countries where the influence of the Jews was strong, that is, in England, France, the USA and Canada. But the zombieification of the Russian people was most successful in Russia, where the Jews conquered power in 1917. The entire press, literature, cinema and theater, as well as the entire education system in Russia, came under the control of Jewish fascists in Marxist-Leninist camouflage. As a result of Jewish zombification, millions of Russian people began to consider it true that “anti-Semitism is a hostile attitude towards poor and good Jews. Inciting hatred towards poor and good Jews. Anti-Semitism is a terrible mental and spiritual illness. And all cultured, normal people should always condemn and condemn anti-Semitism and defend the Jewish people.” Millions of Russian zombies began to consider it true that “anti-Semites are the enemies of the Jews and, therefore, the enemies of all progressive humanity. Anti-Semites are reactionaries, obscurantists, Black Hundreds, racists and fascists. Anti-Semites are dark and evil pathological creatures from which every state, the entire Earth must be cleansed.”
Even Stalin, although he did not like the Jews, was forced to submit to the Jews. In one of his interviews with foreign Jews, to which he was forced, he said that “anti-Semitism is worse than cannibalism” (however, there is still an irony towards the Jews here). In the Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language edited by Professor D. Ushakov, published in 1935 (and republished in 1947), on page 43 it is clearly written: “Anti-Semitism is the persecution of Jews, a hostile attitude towards Jews, incited by the exploiting classes in order to distract the exploited masses from the struggle against oppressors." And the Russian zombies believed in this idiocy!
In the pre-war “Small Soviet Encyclopedia” (Vol. 1. Page 359), in an article by P. Fridlyand it is clearly written that “anti-Semitism is a common term to denote a hostile attitude towards Jews (but not towards Semites in general).” Anti-Semitism is a very bad phenomenon. And it is stated that “the only political organization waging a consistent fight against anti-Semitism was the party of the working class. In subsequent years, the communist parties and the Comintern took a number of decisive measures to combat chauvinism and anti-Semitism." And further: “The USSR is the only country in the world where the fight against anti-Semitism, as well as against any chauvinism (except for Jewish chauvinism, of course, I will add here) has become a task of government policy. The government of the USSR, however, not only persecutes anti-Semitic activity, it creates the conditions for its actual destruction.” And further: anti-Semitism is “the historical legacy of class society.”
After 1991, when the Jews again monstrously gained strength in power, they naturally intensified the fight against “anti-Semitism.” They even tried to get the Duma to pass a law and the President to pass a decree on the fight against anti-Semitism. This did not work out, but the persecution of Russian people who oppose Jewish expansion and the privileged position of Jews in Russia continues. The Jewish fascists, naturally, continue to tightly control the production of Russian language dictionaries. In all dictionaries, the terms “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites” are given only Jewish meaning. And the Jews still manage to maintain complete control over dictionaries in Russia:
“An anti-Semite is a follower of anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism is one of the forms of national and religious hatred, expressed in a hostile attitude towards Jews” (“Big Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language” by S. A. Kuznetsov, St. Petersburg, 1998, p. 42).
“Anti-Semitism is a hostile attitude towards Jews” (Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language of the late 20th century. Compiled by G. N. Sklyarovskaya. St. Petersburg, 1998. P. 54).
“An anti-Semite is a follower, supporter of anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism is a hostile attitude towards Jews.” (“Explanatory Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language. Language changes of the late 20th century.” Compiled by the same G.N. Sklyarovskaya. M., 2001. pp. 28 – 29).
These and other modern dictionaries, although they do not say that “hostility towards Jews” is a bad thing, it is implied. It is implied that any speech by Russians against Jewish expansion and against the privileged position of Jews in Russia is very bad. All dictionaries protect the interests of Jews and Jewish fascists. And, naturally, there is not a word in any explanatory dictionary about the reasons for the hostile attitude towards the Jews. And, of course, not a single modern explanatory dictionary contains the word “Jewish fascism.” This is the level of linguistics in Russia.
But is it possible to give a more objective definition of the terms “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites” in the explanatory dictionary? Certainly.
“Anti-Semitism is a hostile attitude towards Jews, caused by the desire of Jews in many states for domination over indigenous peoples. Anti-Semitism is a hostile attitude towards the Jews, caused by the desire of the Jews to become a commander, ruling the people on Earth. Anti-Semitism is the desire of many peoples of the planet to put an end to Jewish expansion, to end the dominance of Jews in government and in the media. The desire to end the privileged position of Jews and discrimination against indigenous peoples. Anti-Semitism is a hostile attitude towards Jewish fascism and the fight against it.”
“Anti-Semites” are the enemies of Jewish fascists. Anti-Semites are those People who find it humiliating and disgusting to live under the rule of the Jews, the Judaizers and the zombies obedient to them. Anti-Semites are people who fight against Jewish expansion, against the dominance of Jews in government and in the media. Anti-Semites are People who fight against the privileged position of the Jews, against discrimination against indigenous peoples, for the equality of peoples, for the triumph of the principle of national proportional representation in government. Anti-Semites are those People who are fighting for the liberation of their country and their people from the Jewish yoke.”
From the point of view of the interests of indigenous peoples (for example, the Russian people), anti-Semitism is a positive phenomenon, and anti-Semites are the best, heroic part of the people. From the point of view of the interests of the Jewish people, from the point of view of Jewish fascists and zombies, anti-Semitism is a negative phenomenon. For the actions of anti-Semites, if successful, could deprive the Jews of a privileged position in many countries.
But the terms “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites” still cannot be considered successful. These terms (in the Jewish interpretation) are not accepted by most Arabs and other Semitic peoples. And these terms are kept in the minds of hundreds of millions of zombies only through the efforts of Jewish propaganda. But since these terms still exist in the consciousness and vocabulary of hundreds of millions of people who have become victims of Jewish zombification, they should be included in modern explanatory dictionaries.
But dictionaries should also contain an objective definition of these terms, and not just a one-sided Jewish interpretation. Dictionaries must take into account that the words “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites” are ambiguous words. Dictionaries should also have a “Russian interpretation” of these terms. The trend should also be defined in dictionaries: instead of the terms “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites”, the words “anti-Jewishness” and anti-Jewishists, “anti-fascism” and “anti-fascists”, that is, fighters against Jewish fascism, are increasingly used in Russia.
And if someone calls this book “anti-Semitic,” it will either be a deliberate slander of Jews and jikes, or the usual stupidity of zombies.
We are not anti-Semites, we are enemies of Jewish fascism.
But, of course, we don’t need to try to convince the Jews, jikes and zombies of this. This is idiocy. We must give up the slavish habit of making excuses. And from the bad Russian habit of trying to convince our opponents with a word, After all, the Jews, the waiters and the zombies do not need the truth. Disgusting, lying cries about “anti-Semitism” are their “eternal” propaganda weapon. They will scream about “anti-Semitism” until they disappear from the face of the Earth.
***********************
Note. On December 9, 1999, the UN adopted an idiotic resolution (if assessed from a scientific point of view): “anti-Semitism is a form of racism.” This was another victory for the Jewish fascists, jihadists and zombies. True, “discrimination against Arabs, Muslims, Negrophobia and xenophobia” was also condemned. But discrimination against Russians and other white peoples was not condemned. In the term “anti-Semitism” the Jewish interpretation of this term was now more firmly established. Everything that the Jews don’t like is anti-Semitism! Everyone who the Jews don’t like, who doesn’t act in the Jewish interests, is anti-Semite! The Jews rejoiced.
There is, perhaps, no other term that would have so many different connotations (depending on the circumstances of its application) and would be shrouded in such a negative “aura” as “anti-Semitism.” Moreover, “so that no one knows any exact explanation of this term.”
At first glance, such a statement seems paradoxical, because there seems to be an unambiguous interpretation of this word. For example, Wikipedia says:
“Anti-Semitism is a form of national intolerance, expressed in hostility towards Jews as an ethnic or religious group, often based on prejudice. Anti-Semitism is a type of xenophobia.”
And here is what a certain specialist from the Department of Justice writes about the same issue:
“Anti-Semitism is an ideology of hostility towards Jews as an ethnic or religious group, manifested in persecution, humiliation, infliction of shame, violence, incitement of hostility and hostility, discrimination and damage to an individual, social group or part of the population, on the basis of belonging to Jewish people, or because of Jewish ethnic origin, or religious affiliation with Judaism."
But such an interpretation of this initially false word, which is often used as a label, or even a “black mark” for political opponents and other undesirable people, is superficial, intended for the ears of laymen and does not withstand any serious criticism.
There is still no agreement among researchers of the “Jewish question,” on both sides, regarding the permanent meaning of this word. Judging by the “History of Anti-Semitism” by L. Polyakov, anti-Semites are literally everyone who says anything about Jews.
“Most recently, in his book “Jews, Dissidents, Eurocommunists,” Sergei Kara-Murza rightly noted: “If they are hiding from us what anti-Semitism is, then at least tell us what is not considered anti-Semitism.”
And the luminary of “anti-Semitism” himself, academician Igor Shafarevich, in one of his recent interviews said: “I discussed there the question of whether such a position is anti-Semitism or not. And he expressed the point of view that I absolutely don’t understand what “anti-Semitism” is: is it a dislike of certain national traits of Jewish character, or appearance, or a desire to somehow limit the opportunities of Jews in life? Or, like Hitler, a desire, or at least an expression of desire, to physically destroy them? And anyway, what is it? I emphasized that when this term is used, it is never explained. And this is a way to influence mass consciousness. An amorphous term is created, which is outside the sphere of logical reasoning, already by its amorphous nature. It is logically not discussed, and therefore it is impossible to object to it. It only creates an atmosphere of something monstrous.” (Sergei Balandin “What is scientific anti-Semitism?”)
So, this “amorphous term” is used to manipulate the consciousness of the masses, as a trick to avoid resolving specific controversial and conflicting issues; as the last “counter-argument”. In addition, it is used as a kind of “stamp” that makes its bearer “unarmed,” “marginal,” and even an enemy of all “progressive humanity.” Any nationalist is automatically classified as an “anti-Semite,” this is especially true for Russians.
By the way, on July 27, 1918 (9 days after the execution of the Royal Family), a terrible decree on the fight against anti-Semitism, written by the hand of Yakov Sverdlov and signed by Lenin, was published.
It is believed that anti-Semitism is an invariable companion of Semism, is beneficial, first of all, to this movement, and is fueled by it. Let us present several non-trivial interpretations of the term under discussion, which are not just original, but bring us closer to understanding the essence of this word, coined by a socialist-anarchist, picked up by German national conservatives, and subsequently by international Jewry and the Nazis.
German Social Democrat August Bebel believed that “Anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools.” V.I. Lenin loved to quote this phrase from Babel.
Ulrike Meinhof argued that "Anti-Semitism is hatred of capitalism."
Belief in the "evil conspiracy" theory is also called anti-Semitism.
In his “dictionary of terms” Sergei Balandin defines it as follows:
“Anti-Semitism is the attitude towards Jewry as a criminal organization, or as a criminal ideology...”
The term "anti-Semitism" is deliberately ambiguous. The “Providence” website clearly explains the meaning of its use: “Anti-Semitism” is a term used to terrorize humanity. This is a purely ideological maneuver, behind which lies the desire to establish on earth the ideals of the earthly kingdom for the chosen few.”
The word “anti-Semitism” (as, indeed, the word “anti-Semite”) has no right to exist and be used, not because it is incorrect, but because it is meaningless, and this is shown by a simple semantic analysis.
The concept of “Semitism” in all dictionaries is interpreted only as follows: “Semitism, Semitism, many. no, husband (ling.). A figure of speech, an expression in some language. Modeled after some Semitic language or borrowed from it.”
The most commonly used meaning of the particle “anti” is against. Then it turns out: Anti-Semitism is against phrases from Semitic languages, borrowings. That is, in the context under consideration - complete nonsense. Therefore, the compilers of Wikipedia are forced to get out of their way in order to give the interpretation of “anti-Semitism” a scientific quality:
“The term denotes hostility towards Jews or Jews, and not towards all peoples of the Semitic linguistic group. The word “anti-Semitism” was first used by the German publicist Wilhelm Marr in the 19th century. in his pamphlet “The Victory of Germanism over Jewry.” The term is explained by racist ideas about the biological incompatibility of Europeans, who appeared among the first ideologists of racial anti-Semitism as the “Germanic” or “Aryan” race, and Jews as representatives of the “Semitic race.” Since then, it has specifically designated hostility toward Jews, despite attempts, based on etymology, to extend the term to Arabs, due to the fact that they also speak the language of the Semitic group. (Edward Said and others)."
All these rhetorical tricks are wonderfully broken down on the anti-Semitism forum:
Jews deliberately distort the meaning of the terms “Semite” and “anti-Semitism”. The term “anti-Semite” in the sense in which Jews use it (a hostile attitude specifically and only towards Jews) is complete nonsense. You cannot be “anti” of something that does not exist. In the scientific understanding, there are only Semitic languages, but there are no Semitic peoples or ethnic groups. You can, of course, become an “anti-Semite,” but to do this you will have to very much dislike the entire Semitic group of languages.”
The modern use of the concept of "Semites" was coined by the historian August Ludwig Schlözer (1735 - 1809). Schlözer put a biblical, mythical meaning into this concept.
In addition to, by the way, a very small number of Jews, Semites are called Semites, representatives of many other numerous peoples - these are: Akkadu, Amorites, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Arameans, Chaldeans, Mainians, Adramauts, Sabaeans, Katabans, Lihyanites, Thamud, Arabs, Maltese, Mahri, Shahri, Socotra, Amhara, Tigre, Israelis, New Syrians, Ethiopians, speaking languages belonging to the family of Semitic languages.
After reviewing this study, any sane person will naturally ask the question: “Is the existence of anti-Semitism possible in principle?”
And now about the history of the appearance of this term: “At the end of the seventies of the nineteenth century, Marr settled in Berlin. And here he was rewarded for all the failures of his journalistic and publicistic activities of past years. In 1879, Marr’s now famous brochure “The Victory of Jewry over Germany” was published. From a non-denominational point of view." The success of the book was undoubted: already in the same year, twelve reprints were published. It was in this work that the word “anti-Semitism”, which has become so notorious, appeared.
It was important for Marr to find a fresh equivalent for the expression “Jew-hatred” (“Judenhass”), as he sought to emphasize the new content of this concept: racial incompatibility was to take the place of traditional religious anti-Judaism.
The author did not find a better replacement for the word “Jewishness”, “Judaism” than “Semitism”. Marr most likely knew that the Arabs, against whom he had nothing, were also Semites. But the only “European Semites” were the Jews. The word “Jew” itself in most languages of the world is almost indistinguishable from the word “Jew.” To emphasize the special, “racial” meaning of this word, instead of the combination “racial Jew,” he uses the concept “(European) Semite.” No amount of assimilation and no amount of baptism will turn a “Semite” into a normal European.
In addition, the term “anti-Semitism” created the illusion of “scientificness” and placed Judeophobia, not very revered in enlightened circles, on a par with such venerable concepts as “liberalism”, “capitalism”, “communism”.
Starting with this small book of less than fifty pages, a new form of prejudice, as old as the world, begins its history - “political anti-Semitism” was born. It existed in embryonic form throughout the “century of emancipation,” but it took final shape, acquired the features of a political movement and became the program of political parties only after 1879” (Berkovich).
Replacing the word “Jewishness,” not to mention “Judaism,” with the far-fetched “Semitism” is not so much not entirely successful as an initially false enterprise. Not only because neither The Jewish nation, much less the race, does not exist in nature, but also because the majority of “Jews” in Europe are “Ashkenazim,” that is, a mixture of Turkic, Slavic and other peoples (with a scanty admixture of Semites) who once converted to Judaism and speak Yiddish. Thus, the vast majority of them have nothing to do with the Semites either by language or blood.
Having reduced the conflict between the “Jews” and the Germans to a racial conflict, the resolution of which can only be achieved by the destruction of the “inferior race,” Wilhelm Marr became the creator of a great, tenacious lie, and the predecessor of Hitler.
If Marr had written his work twenty years later, he would not have needed to “invent” the term, since “Zionism”, which appeared in 1897, was perfectly suited for this. It is not for nothing that anti-Semitism is often identified with anti-Zionism (at the same time, Zionism should be considered not “political” - according to Herzl, but “cultural” - according to Ahad Ham).
The “Jewish question” played an important role in the rise and fall of Russian communism. Many authors think so. In his book The Kabbalah of Power, Israel Shamir wrote the following on this subject: “The Western left had very strong Jewish ties. Some of these leftists were infected with Jewish nationalism. They turned their pens and their efforts against communism when they realized that Russian communism had, after all, become predominantly Russian. To justify their betrayal, they began to spread black lies about “Russian anti-Semitism.”
Professor of the University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Vasily Drozhzhin in his textbook on the history of the Russian state and law quite rightly notes: “I. V. Stalin, like no one else, understood that Trotskyism was only part of the iceberg, whose name is Zionism, and knew the ultimate goals of the latter, what threat it posed to the Soviet Union, giving its adherents the common name of “enemies of the people.” “The defeat of German fascism did not mean that the Soviet Union had no enemies. The older brother of fascism, Zionism, remained and began to gain strength. For Zionists, ordinary Jews are just a means to achieve goals, cannon fodder. Shortly before his death, Stalin ordered the publication of a statement in the Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper “... that the struggle against Zionism has nothing to do with anti-Semitism. Zionism is the enemy of the working people of the whole world, Jews no less than non-Jews.”
Alexander Ogorodnikov
The history of the Jewish people began with the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob-Israel about four thousand years ago. God chose their descendants, the people of Israel, for a specific, special role in the destinies of this world. The essence of this election is service, which involves not only great privilege, but also great responsibility. And the entire history of the Jews was accompanied by opposition to this people, so that they would not fulfill their destiny. At the heart of this confrontation is the phenomenon of anti-Semitism.
Most secular researchers view anti-Semitism as an ideology in its socio-economic and political context. Concise Jewish Encyclopedia defines anti-Semitism as an ideological and political movement aimed at combating Jewry. The term “anti-Semitism” itself was introduced in the late 70s. 19th century German journalist Wilhelm Mar, a radical anti-Semite who called his group of followers the “anti-Semitic League.” First, this term came into widespread use in Germany, and then in other countries. Before the term “anti-Semitism,” the term “hatred of Semites” had been common for some time, but it did not catch on.
Analysis of the term itself “ anti-Semitism” from a linguistic point of view, and especially given that this term was coined by anti-Semites themselves, can provide important information about this phenomenon. Thus, the suffix “ism” in most cases indicates a typical social phenomenon or behavior or a certain ideology based on a unified system of principles (socialism, liberalism, communism, etc.). The very fact of preferring such a term to the preceding “hatred of Semites” emphasizes the universality of this phenomenon. Researchers note that the emergence and rapid spread of the term “anti-Semitism” became an expression of a new stage in hatred of Jews, associated with the combination of Judeophobia and racism in the second half of the 19th century. The apogee of such hatred was the Holocaust, when about 6 million Jews were physically exterminated by the Nazis during World War II. Thus, secular researchers view anti-Semitism as a form of hostility towards Jews at a certain historical stage and define it in ideological and political terms.
However anti-Semitism- this is a phenomenon that has existed, firstly, since ancient times, and secondly, not some sociologically, psychologically, economically or any other naturally explainable phenomenon, but a spiritual phenomenon. One of the most important spirits of malice, which from heaven attacks human hearts, minds, wills, and lives, is the spirit of malice towards the Jews, otherwise the spirit of anti-Semitism. This is an ancient spirit that wages its fierce struggle not only against the Jews, but against all peoples who know about the Jews. And behind him stands the organizer of all hostile actions on earth - the father of lies, the murderer Satan. He has been fighting against the Jews, starting with the patriarch of the Jewish people, Abraham. Thus, Satan tried from the very beginning to prevent the formation of the Jewish people. He involved a variety of people in this struggle. Genesis 12:16-20 tells how the Egyptian Pharaoh took Abraham's wife ( then still Abram) Sarah ( future Sarah) to his palace. If Sarah had become Pharaoh's wife or concubine, God's promise to Abraham that he would have the promised son would not have been fulfilled. A striking biblical example of an attempt to completely physically exterminate the Jews is the story described in the Book of Esther. And in each such story, God came to the defense of His people, defeating those people and even nations who, making themselves an instrument in the hands of Satan, rebelled against the Jews.
Antisemitism- This is not only the physical persecution, oppression or extermination of Jews. One of the manifestations of anti-Semitism is the attempt to corrupt the Jewish people and turn them away from faith in the God of Israel. Numbers, chapters 22-23 describe the story of the prophet Balaam, who was hired by the Moabite king Balak to curse Israel. And although Balaam, still being a prophet from God at that time, could not curse Israel, he taught the Moabites how to seduce the Jews into fornication and idolatry (Num. 25 chapter).
If in ancient times the spirit of anti-Semitism was active among those peoples who immediately surrounded Israel, today it is active throughout the entire earth. Using various means, including the media, he is trying to poison the minds of people in all countries of the world. Most people who are hostile to Jews do not have any logical reason for it. Many of us know the widespread opinion at the level of “everyday” anti-Semitism: “ Jews are greedy, insidious, cunning, you need to be afraid of them, beware of them, you need to protect yourself from them, you need to take some measures. This does not apply to my personal Jewish friends. Almost all the Jews I interact with are nice, kind people. But in general Jews are bad" And no facts can convince those who believe in the anti-Semitic myth. It spreads, takes root, and becomes fixed in the minds of a variety of people, regardless of origin, education, nationality, etc. Especially if their fathers and grandfathers believed in this myth.
Unfortunately, we have to admit that Christian churches are also susceptible to the influence of anti-Semitism to varying degrees. Among Christians, perhaps the most common form of anti-Semitism is indifference to the fate of the Jewish people, knowing about their chosenness and destiny. The insidiousness of this form of anti-Semitism is that it is hidden and opens the lives of God's children to serious defeat without any outwardly obvious reasons.
The spiritual war against the Jewish people, waged by Satan and his army, will intensify and will not subside until the second coming of the Messiah. Attitudes towards Jews will become more and more important both for the individual and for groups of people. And at the end of times it will become decisive for churches, confessions, denominations, and even for entire nations. By the way they treated the Jews they will be judged by Almighty God. And if this comes true for entire nations, huge churches, then it will come true for each individual person.
Best regards, I. Rusnyak
ANTI-SEMITISM, an ideology and political movement aimed at combating Jewry. The term “anti-Semitism” arose in the late 70s. 19th century in Germany. Anti-Semitism, in essence, is a form of hostility towards the Jewish people at a certain historical stage. The reasons for the hostile attitude towards Jews are rooted in ancient times. The most important of them was a consequence of the inevitable conflict between the monotheistic minority and the pagan world that surrounded it...
Dreyfus case, the trial of Alfred Dreyfus (1859, Mulhouse, Alsace, - 1935, Paris), a Jewish officer of the French army, brought to trial on false charges of treason and espionage for Germany, heard throughout the world. Dreyfus was born into an assimilated family of a wealthy Alsatian manufacturer who settled in Paris after the Franco-Prussian War. After graduating from the polytechnic school, he entered the army as an engineer...
CARICATURE. Caricatured images of Jews appeared long before the crystallization of the caricature genre in the plastic arts as printed satirical and humorous graphics. Jewish participation in the development of the art of caricature began in the 19th century. and coincided in time with the development of revolutionary movements in Western Europe. For a long time, caricature among Jews did not occupy the position that it was given in the social and political life of non-Jewish society...
BLOOD LIBEL, accusing Jews of killing non-Christians to consume their blood for ritual purposes. Similar accusations, which became widespread in the Middle Ages in various Catholic countries of Europe, and later in Orthodox countries, continued to appear in the 19th and 20th centuries, mainly under the influence of anti-Semitic and Nazi propaganda. Papal bulls and royal decrees were issued against them in vain, enlightened circles of the European public spoke unsuccessfully, severely condemning the appearance of blood libels in the civilized world...
YOUNG HEHELIANS, or left Hegelians, representatives of the philosophical movement of the 1830s–40s. in Germany, who interpreted the teachings of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel in the spirit of radical criticism of religion. The critical study of the New Testament was started by David Friedrich Strauss with his book “The Life of Jesus” (1835), where he considered the Gospel narrative as a myth. Although Strauss himself did not belong to the radical wing of the Hegelian school, his work gave rise to a fierce controversy in which the Young Hegelians made sharp attacks on religion...
MORTAR CASE, a conflict that arose as a result of the forcible removal by papal police in 1858 of a six-year-old Jewish boy, Edgardo Mortara, from Bologna in order to raise him as a Christian. The reason was that five years earlier the child had been secretly baptized by a Christian woman who served in the house of Mortara’s parents, who thought that the boy was dying...
DISTINCTIVE SIGN, a symbol that Jews were forced to wear to set them apart from the rest of the population. The distinctive sign for religious minorities was first introduced in Islamic countries, apparently in the eighth century: non-Muslims were ordered to wear clothes of special colors and shapes. These clothes were called giyar. The decree was not always carried out with the same rigor, but in 850, during the reign of Caliph al-Mutawakkil, it was confirmed by a special decree and strictly implemented...
PETLYURA Simon Vasilievich (Symon Petlyura; 1879, Poltava, - 1926, Paris), Ukrainian politician, leader of the Ukrainian nationalist movement during the civil war of 1918–20. He studied at an Orthodox theological seminary, from which he was expelled for participating in the Ukrainian revolutionary movement. Emigrated to Lvov. Since 1900 - a member of the Revolutionary Ukrainian Party, then the Ukrainian Social Democratic Party. Upon returning to Russia, he collaborated in the Kyiv newspapers Hromadska Dumka and Rada; from 1906 - editor of the newspaper “Slovo”...
INTEREST RATE(cf. Latin numerus clausus, 'limited number'), discriminatory measures against Jews carried out by government agencies and public organizations in different countries. In a narrow sense, the percentage norm is a legislative restriction on the admission of Jews to higher and secondary educational institutions, which was in force in Russia from 1887 to 1917...
